Rayner

Well if you don't think they are going to be at the level of those players (and they most likely won't, since you're talking about basically two HOFers), then there's really no point in giving up anything for them. Entirely possible that Bowser or Williams could be the Suggs heir apparent. And based on the trade value chart, it would have cost a 3rd to move up from 16 to 14. Bowser and Williams Combined could be Suggs heir apparent. And notice the quotation mark around the next Ed Reed. There's almost a 0% chance that Hooker becomes as good as the best player in his position in the history of Football, but his massive upside and similarities and we could have someone as close as you can get. The 3rd we spent on Williams could have been used to move up for either (Even though I think Williams is massive value that late)

Never mind trading up and giving up a king's ransom for, let's face it, WRs that don't have the talent levels or college production as most of the last few classes (And that's before all 3 of their injury histories are taken into account) when there were 3 players that I would have loved but wouldn't have pegged falling to us going 14th, 15th and 17th. How much would it have cost to move up a couple of spots to get "The next Ed Reed" or Suggs heir apparent? A 4th?

I hope somone like Zay Jones or Malachi Dupre are there in the 3rd for us. Etta-Tawo on day 3 would be another

I can see the Henry pick with him may be being the best player left on the board and he's from Alabama but if Jackson III, Whitehair, one of the 3-6 best Tackles Spence or Jaylon fall that far I hope we take Defence or O-Line pretty much all through the draft.

About a month back I was hoping for Jaylon Smith or Ramsey but with Smith's injury and last year's first rounder not playing a snap then Ozzie is not going to risk him. Ideally now if Ramsey is gone at 6 then there's hopefully a trade back for Hargreeves then use whatever later rounders we pick up coupled with the 37 pick to move up enough to take Smith