ngatainmyhouse

why not have Jensen at LG and keep Urschel at Center?

And it isn't like Jack would need much grooming. He would have an immediate impact and would compliment Mosley very well. I am all on board with Jack.

A lot has to do with the rumors regarding is lack of love for the game. That's an issue because I'd rather have someone less talented with the desire to be the best than have a guy that's content

I feel like there's no way he makes it to the 20s. Stranger things of happened but he's ranked a lot higher than Melvin Gordon was coming out and with Todd Gurley's success it's more reasonable for teams to go up and get a RB that can be a difference maker

We also could have to the same opinion on Stanley. If there isn't a huge dropoff than is it worth giving up what we would have to in order to get Tunisl when we could just grab Stanley and keep what we would be willing to give up

If we could trade Forsett and get any value I think I would be on board with it. Buck Allen and Zeke would be a great and inexpensive back field. That could free up room to re-sign Brandon Williams before he leaves for top dollar like Osemele did

No way the Chargers would trade back if Tunsil is there. But I think the Cowboys are potential trade candidates to jump the Jags. If Elliot or a QB is their guy than there's 100% at least one, more than likely both and on top of that there's still going to be a top talent available like Bosa, Jack or Buckner

And there are so many needs this year that I think we can't address all of them just through the draft itself.

In this case does Eugene Monroe have any sort of trade value along with picks? That way they still get a OT and can still pick up a guy they'd like with 6th pick on top of other picks as well. I would be willing to give up a lot for Tunsil....

I wish this thread was deleted so I wasn't reminded of KO leaving every time I check out the forum. I was a fan of KO until I saw that he previously mentioned he was going to be a FA at the beginning of last season. I'm actually glad he left because players in the recent Ravens history that've left for the money so live up to their new contracts.

Is Monroe's injury history really that big of a deal? It seems to me that he's hasn't missed too much other than last year. I know its scary with a LT that isn't 100% reliable but does that justify taking Stanley at No. 6? I feel like there's plenty of depth towards the end of the 1st early second that the Ravens could get more value out of tackle than taking Stanley at 6. If Monroe stays healthy than there's zero issue with LT. Meanwhile, the Ravens have multiple long-term issues on defense that could be addressed with our 1st pick

The only scenario I would see is if someone trades up to No. 1 to jump the Browns for a QB. Then the could move back to 6 and grab either the 2nd QB on their board or grab a guy like Bosa that they potentially may've taken at No. 2

I feel like that early in the 2nd is too much of a gamble at that point. I wouldn't mind if we went with Buckner, Spence, and then trade back up in the the 50s to grab Jaylon Smith.

Tunsil

Chad Reuter just came out with his latest mock and has the Ravens going with: 1st: Buckner (Tunsil, Wentz, Ramsey, Bosa and Jack were the 1st five) 2nd: Jaylon Smith (this pick had the Ravens passing both Spence and WJ3) 3rd: Jalen Mills 4th: Rashard Hollywood Higgins I'd love it would've gone Buckner, WJ3, Jaylon in the 3rd and then Higgins in the 4th