VeiledPsychosis

Members
  • Content count

    959
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by VeiledPsychosis


  1. 1 minute ago, OLD SCHOOL SMASH BALL said:

    How many people think we reached for pick 70?  If we were pucking best player available, Correa would not be it. Who would you have rather had at 70?

    I could see how he could be BPA, versatile, athletic, great against the run, athletic enough to cover well, and can develop as a pass rusher. I'd like to have taken someone else but Correa is a good player, no need to harp on it.

    0

  2. 2 minutes ago, GrimCoconut said:

    I forgot all about him but yeah, he's a good prospect as well. He's exciting. 

    He's been my favorite this whole process but with Correa and Kaufusi I don't see us taking him, I'd love it though, great against the run and uses his hands so well when rushing the passer.

    0

  3. I don't hate our class so far, I just hate that we haven't taken any players that have me particularly excited. These last two players we've taken seem like high floor/moderately high ceiling guys and I'm guessing that's what Ozzie's targeting, nothing special but solid pieces. There's still lots of good guys out there and we've got a ton of picks left (though I suspect we're going to be maneuvering so we aren't taking however many picks we have left), we can still get some exciting players. Stanley seems like a high ceiling guy, Correa looks athletic and versatile - I've started comparing high to a more athletic Albert McClellan, a guy that can play outside or inside, and I do like Kaufusi - I'm just disappointed that we passed on Fuller to take him. We're doing fine and we'll probably end this draft with a solid "B" when it's all said and done.

    0