1. Long may not necessarily be an upgrade over Lewis at LT but the combo of Long / Lewis on the left side would most likely be an upgrade over Hurst / Lewis, Lewis / Urschel.
2. Our line has been one of our biggest issues. We lost 3 one score games in a row - having said tandem on the left whilst we suffered other injuries on the right may have been enough to buy a split second here or there, which in turn could have been the difference in such close games.
3. The preseason reference is exactly what it is. There's a preseason for a reason. I would rather test my depth when it doesn't count and live with the assumptions - particularly in relation to a 'backup' than play said player in a live game to find out he's not suitable.
4. Obviously there are short and long term implications with each signing.
My point is simply that of all the vets we signed this offseason other than Weddle ie - Powers, Watson, Hester - the one guy we brought in (obviously we had an interest) only to let walk away due to his refusal to sign a waiver for what - $1 mil or so (how much are we giving Powers, Watson, Hester? Could have actually helped us win games and yes I'm referring to right now, not next season, not in 5 years time.
Would he have stunted somebody's growth or a chance to find depth - he's not starting over Stanley, Lewis is just a backup at the position, Hurst who cares, Urschel whatever
at 3-0 when we are in every race or position we need to be as a team - im not fazed about depth at a position i just spent #6 pick on, how bout I just slide in 4 time pro bowler as his back up, rather than some bum who doesn't cut it and then I have to shuffle my line even more.
5. Its a balancing act between bringing guys in to supplement and bringing guys in that are impeding.
6. the results speak for themselves - what's been one of our biggest issues - the line, the man could have helped right now, this season and I think you'd be on your own worrying about LT depth for next year if Long's filling in and we're sitting at 4-2, 5-1