ravensnation5220

Members
  • Content count

    1,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by ravensnation5220


  1. 2 hours ago, LosT_in_TranSlatioN said:

    I've been giving it more thought since I've recently read reports about us having interest in Cam Robinson and....

     

    Yeah Cam Robinson would still be terrible. Probably the worst pick we could make. And I have this gut feeling we take him. Say what you want about the Correa pick last year, I think given the success that Zach Orr had last year that Correa could hack it at ILB at a pretty decent level like Orr did. 

     

    So Ozzie. You don't take Larmey Tunsil, clearly a superior physical talent and has a higher ceiling than Stanley because of drug concerns(a move I actually agree with. I don't need my players being the next Randy Gregory/Josh Gordon), but Robinson has drug concerns and there are reports out that we really like him? Freaking hypocrite. Tunsil had upside. Robinson does at guard, but he has a low floor. I swear to god when he takes him... 

     

    But yeah. I'd like to add a name to the list: Christian McCaffery. Not that I hate him as a prospect, in fact, I like him a lot, but we have far more pressing needs. I know he's rumored to go in the top ten(and when the Panthers take him I will LOL), but I highly doubt he does and think he will be avaliable then. I'd be upset, but live with the solace that I think he's gonna be a good player.

     

     

    So let me ask this then

     

    Who would you be upset with in the second round?

     

    Me: Any RB really. Any dlinemen since I'm not impressed by most of them. I think that Kevin King and Jalen Tabor are overrated. 

     

     

    Yeah. 

     

    @-Truth-

     

    Cam Robinson has overtaken James Harden on my personal hate scale. 

    I dont thin Cams issues are nearly as bad as Tunsils. His charges were dropped and he never had any other issues. I really cant compare Cams situation to tunsil. Tunsil is a much better prospect yes. However Cam is a mammoth of an athlete. We said we want to get bigger on the Oline and Cam would do that the minute he walked into the building. I understand the dislike for Cam, not the hate

    3

  2. So i was reading an interview with Quincy Wilson on draftbreakdown and he was asked if he had any odd questions asked like getting into a starring contest. This was his reply:

    "Nobody got into a staring contest with me [laughs]. I do have one story for you though. The Cincinnati [Bengals] coach asked me if I had 37 cents with seven coins, what would I have? I wasn’t able to answer that. I didn’t know." 

    Lol.....cant even do simple math....took me like 10 seconds to figure it out. 2dimes, 3nickles, 2pennies......some of these questions have reasoning behind it and they dont realize it

    0

  3. 1 minute ago, rossihunter2 said:

    It's a struggle lol... I'm not going to start talking myself into him unless we draft him because I know it'll be a difficult process - at which point I will watch every bit of tape on him over and over again just hoping I see something new

    until that time though I personally just can't see anything to like about him at 16

    Hopefully the bengals or saints take him so we dont have to worry about that lol

    1

  4. I like this mock Butt i think i like your sense of humor more.

    I may be higher on Cam Robinson than most here and i would think of him as more of a "smart" or "safe" choice. I just think he will start on any teams offensive line regardless if he plays either G position or RT. Plus hes a mauler and we want a bigger oline so i wouldnt be against the pick.

    Would you be ok with Cam if we ended up with Butt at some point? lol

    3

  5. 2 minutes ago, arnie_uk said:

    Without the injury history hed be the first wide receiver off the board I think 

    The weird thing about guys with injury history in college is some guys end up becomming extremely reliable and never seem to get hurt in the pros and the ones who stay healthy end up being injury prone in the NFL. Its not always like that but it does happen

    0

  6. 1 minute ago, rmw10 said:

    You never really know with a diluted sample, but it's another red flag that teams have to consider.  That puts him in the program so if he is a user, he's already got a strike against him before he even has a job.  Sometimes you can get a diluted sample with regular hydration and it truly is a mistake that gets rectified in the next test.  Sometimes though, it's used to hide usage.  I used to work in HR and I'd wager to guess the percentage of people who failed the 2nd test after providing a diluted sample was about 70%.

    He said he was sick and had food poisoning

    0

  7. 15 minutes ago, BOLDnPurPnBlacK said:

    Diluted samples typically register as a positive.

    Because normally the only way you'd get a sample that diluted is by tampering, using some sort of diuretic, or way over hydrating.... why typically only happens when someone knows theyre going to test positive and are trying to hide it. 

    It was just championship level hydration lol

    C94ecllUAAAM94q.jpg

    5

  8. John Ross should have had 25+ touchdowns last year. 

    His qb Browning did him no service what so ever. He did make the 15-25 yard throws right on the money but underthrew him countless times on deep balls.....it is obsurd how bad it was at times. 

    Its not only that, hes missed his read a ton of times as well where Ross was wide open on seam routes and crossing routes. 

    Another note after watching the tape Ross seems to have very solid hands. Not too many drops what so ever and bailed out his qb a bunch as well. Hes a better blocker than one would think. Hes more than willing and sometimes thats all you can ask for 

    0