You nailed it! The FO's stance on the offense is simple... they've just got to play better. That's so easy to say. I am sure OC Marty will be relieved to hear it. Let's see. He has Wallace, Waller, Moore, Perriman, Matthews, Campanero and now Woodhead. Of the entire bunch, only two have proven they are starters - Wallace and Woodhead. The others have some potential but that's the worse thing you can say about an athlete. I would like to see Q come back to Bmore for an encore but don't count on it after the way the FO treated him after the SB. Ask yourself why Waller is a WR and not a TE. Get Perriman to make the routine chain-moving catches a pro is supposed to make for his QB instead of an occasional circus catch. Keep Campanero healthy for a whole season. Good luck, Marty! If we go into the season with Wallace, Perriman and Moore as the top 3 WRs, you are in serious trouble unless you can get them to "just play better". But what the heck, it will give the Flacco doubters and detractors some more cannon fodder. Not drafting a WR in this draft is symptomatic of a FO in denial, delusion or delirium. That's what is simple. In fact, its so simple its offensive (pun intended).
1. Well most of them have potential because they've only been in the league for about a year. By definition, that's what the majority of second year players in this league have in this league at this point. If teams wrote off all those players after a year, they'd be missing out on studs quite often. 2. Waller is a WR because we had like 7 TEs at the time, and he offers very little as a blocker, which is a requirement for a TE. 3. At the end of the day, it really doesn't matter who our "top 3 WRs" are, because three receivers aren't producing in this offense. They never have, regardless of who the OC is. Two WRs can produce, 1-2 TEs can produce, and a RB can produce. That's it. If your third WR is catching like 50-60 passes, that means we're throwing the ball 600+ times a season. That means we aren't running the ball effectively and we're losing games. 4. I mean I guess we could have drafted a WR, but obviously it wasn't happening in the first round, since the only one's worth that price tag were long gone before we picked. I only saw 3 go in the 2nd round, and I wasn't impressed with any of them outside of Zay Jones, who again, went long before we picked. So I guess we could have used a 3rd round pick or later on a guy, but obviously its naive to think they're going to come in and start for us right away.
funny how you use the word "obviously" while trying to make your points. The only thing that is obvious is it's your opinion, and not fact