hen826957

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    2,630

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by hen826957

  7. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    3 hours ago, Ravensfansince03 said:

    Man, after listening to Steve Smith, and watching john Ross's highlight tape...I'm convinced that we need to pick Ross if he's available

    In all honestly, I'm not a big fan of John Ross that much. He's just a speedster with questionable hands and we already got speed. He probably gonna be another Tavon Austin, Brandin Cooks type of a player. We need big wideouts so I like Corey Davis or Mike Williams better imo.

    0

  10. Posted · Report post

    Reuben Foster could also be another great pick for the Ravens but l think that the Ravens should've sign Zach Brown as to he only sign a 1 year deal worth up 4.65M with the Skins and we wouldn't have to use a 1st round pick on a LB if that's the case he slips. We could then focus on pass rusher and Wr instead of passrusher, Wr, and LB. Now we got 3 choices instead of having 2. But if they don't draft Foster, then Correa got to step up.

    1

  15. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    4 hours ago, Azzi22 said:

    Foster... Reddick.. Cook.. Davis.. .Barnett...Mike Williams and Peppers are all on board at 16... who do you choose? ... The one player I desperately think would be the perfect raven is TIM WILLIAMS... what a bad butt MF

    Hmmm... nice list. I really don't have a specific choice but l prefer either Foster, Davis, Barnett, or Williams. If either of those 4 are still on the board, you got to take him. If none of the guys l mention are gone, then trade back a couple of spots. I hope l don't see them trade back when either are these guys are still on the board when we pick. So l hope that's not the case. 👍

    0

  16. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    10 minutes ago, fluffy201 said:

    If the Ravens can fix the O line like they did the secondary I will be very optimistic about the Ravens season, and I would not have said that a few months ago. I still think we are one year away from a super bowl run though. I think the wild card is a possibility for the Ravens, I don't see them winning the division if Pittsburgh stays healthy though.

    I agree. I think the Ravens are one year away for contending for a championship. We fans got to realize is that it is very hard to fix every hole in one year. We did a good job getting pieces for the secondary this year now it might take next offseason to get some pieces for the offense. 2018 might be a huge year for us, and l hope we have a decent year in 2017 and compete for a playoff spot. 👍

    0

  17. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    39 minutes ago, steelcityraven said:
    3 hours ago, bioLarzen said:
      3 hours ago, Azzi22 said:
      3 hours ago, bioLarzen said:
      3 hours ago, Azzi22 said:

    Foster... Reddick.. Cook.. Davis.. .Barnett...Mike Williams and Peppers are all on board at 16... who do you choose? ... The one player I desperately think would be the perfect raven is TIM WILLIAMS... what a bad butt MF

    Trade back. One of them will still be available 7-8 spots later, and you net one or two more picks.

    Solid choice... you think we can pick up a 2nd or a 3rd rounder? to move back 7-8 spots

    Moving back 7-8 spots to #16 means a net trade value gain of around 250 points (according to the "standard" TVC which most experts still use). That would easily net us a trhird rounder PLUS a fifth or sith rounder in the pick #24-27 region. A second rounder would be a huge steal - those picks are worth about 40-70 points more than 250 points. Not totally out of question if a team gets desperate enough - but I don't think it's a likely scenario.
    If, however, one of the #28-32 teams wanted to trade up... that could net us their first and second rounder - and maybe then some... However, jumping up that much in the first round doesn't happen too often...

    Agreed.... I am expecting to gain a 3rd rounder by trading back ( I think the # 24 -#28 spot is realistic) and we can still get the player we are looking for.... plus

    If we drop the all the way to # 26-28.... I really do see us getting a 3rd and a 5th... at least a 3rd and a 6th.

    I think dropping back from #16 to #24-#28 is way too far to me imo. You be almost drafting at the end of the first round. The only way l would trade back that far is they have to give me their second rounder or a 1st round pick in next years draft not for just a 3rd rounder or later pick. For me, l would just only trade back to #20 at best no later if the guys we are interested are off the board. 

    0

  22. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    On 4/7/2017 at 8:29 AM, rossihunter2 said:

    How are any of those options better than webby who in his first season at safety showed solid play and created a nice tandem with weddle - at worst he comes in as solid depth but he could also potentially allow pees to get creative with Jefferson and weddle to maybe offset the loss of Orr in coverage

    I didn't mean that he was a better option, l say l wouldn't mind signing him if they didn't want to resign Webb. But now that Webb is back, he could give us good amount of depth in the secondary. I like Webb. 👍

    0

  24. Posted · Edited by hen826957 · Report post

    17 minutes ago, rmcjacket23 said:

    We don't need 4 decent receivers at one time unless there's injuries. The 3rd WR in our system never put up quality production stats... and that's in a pass first offense. On a balanced team that runs the ball well, this offense is only going to yield production out of 1 TE and 2 WRs for the most part. Your 3rd WR is going to get maybe 3-4 targets a game and probably only catch 2-3 balls.

    Not 4 receivers at one time, l'm just saying it gives Joe a decent amount of receivers to throw too. That's all. Don't necessary have to sign Boldin. It could just gives us another target that Joe is comfortable with. 

    0