I don't think I would make the assumption that he won't be that expensive. He had a ridiculously good year with Buffalo. The four years prior to that season he did not play that well. He almost doubled his tackles in 2016 compared to 2015. He had 149 tackles last year and before that he never even broke the 100 tackle mark. Now if we sign him to a contract based solely on last season, we could get screwed down the line when he doesnt put up those kind of numbers. And if that happened people here (even the people that are advocating for the FO to sign him) will say what a terrible move the FO made by signing a guy that has had one good season in his entire career. He and his agent are looking for that type of contract and that type of contract is not going to be as inexpensive as you are predicting. But expense is relative. It will be inexpensive compared to BWills contracts for sure. But it will be expensive for a player who has only had one good season in his five year career. I like Zach. I think he would be a good addition, but he is a risky signing, and we are going to have to throw more money to him that he probably deserves at this point. There is another factor here which the front office would have a better understanding than I do at this point. And that is what his success last year is attributed to. I think whatever the answer to that question is will make us either more or less willing to shell out the dough to sign him.
It will be a good signing. He even had decent seasons before even last year. Just by looking at his stats, 2015: 77 tackles, 0.5, 2 ints, 2014: l guess he didn't play, 2013: 91 tackles, 4 sacks, 1 int, 2012: 93 tackles, 5.5 sacks, 3 ints. Between 2013-2012 he got Mosley numbers of this season so l wouldn't say he had one good season. He had a good season in his rookie year with the Titans. 3 years, 20 million will probably be enough to get him. He's a good plug in play to replace Orr. At least he know how to sack the Qb.