hn68wb4

I'd be willing to bet that Ozzie's phone is ringing off the hook

Just now, ellicottraven said:

Hassan Reddick gone before Foster??

Foster's offseason has been horrible to say the least - and he's kind of overrated

Just now, jazz1988 said:

I think The Cardinals take Hooker or Howard.

Howard makes sense, could reach on Kizer, Palmer is pretty much done

I still think that at this rate we're moving back, so many good players available, the phone has to be ringing and stock piling picks in this draft is a great move

At this point, considering the depth on the board, don't be surprised if we're moving back as well

Browns getting Garrett and Hooker...

"The New Orleans select"

Just now, rossihunter2 said:

who would have thought before all this happened the depth of players we'd have to select from at 16

People still whining that the depth is available isn't offensive.

2 minutes ago, Adreme said:

He isnt going to be beating them out until his 3rd year...maybe.  You have possibly the top safety combo in the NFL.  Why take a player who will likely not contribute for several years.

3 years? based on what? Weddle is 32 and Webb is going to turn 32 during next season. Also, you're acting as if we don't get our guys playing time, wehther he's starting or not he's going to see plenty of playing time.

Saints are sitting pretty with Allen, Reuben, Lattimore, and Hooker available, not to mention Barnett

Just now, ravensdfan said:

I have three thoughts on this so far:

 

Another year we don't give Flacco any playmakers.

More talent we give to Pees to watch him fail.

Then again, we really are crap at picking WRs anyway.

 

You're saying that as if we passed on these guys rrather than them just getting picked ahead of us. None of these guy are worth moving up for.

Shocked that they're moving up for a QB, didn't see KC doing that

Chiefs have moved up to #10, who are they coming up to get

Thank you Bengals, let the actual contenders for our pick drop. Both Lattimore and Hooker are still available

100% Bengals have to take Hooker, missed whatshisname at FS last year

No reason to panic for our pick, there's still a ton of fantastic options on the board...

Not saying they will, but I still wouldn't be surprised if the first lineman comes off the board at #9

Losing a starting LT and top RG is rough

As much as I like Barnett, it must be pointed out that we never had him in for a private workout - something we've done for every first rounder in the last 5 years at least

Lattimore or Hooker has to be the Jets' pick

Just now, 52520Andrew said:

Ian Rapoport‏Verified account @RapSheet  16s17 seconds ago

More

Wow. Cleveland is trying to trade for Kirk Cousins. This is real.

Never underestimate the craziness of the draft

Didn't expect him to make it to 16 whether the Titans took him or not

1 minute ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

i really wanna see the titans take oj howard... 

but i think theyre going mike williams or jamal adams

I think OJ Howard makes a lot of sense for them, but with Adams and Hooker on the board I can't see them passing that up, maybe even Lattimore

Shocked that none of the safeites have come off the board yet

On 4/16/2017 at 6:02 PM, hn68wb4 said:

Solomon Thomas goes nowhere near top 5 and all the "experts" will act amazed on the draft broadcast - fingers crossed John Lynch is at least somewhat competent for this one to come true

Gonna pull an @rossihunter2 and quote myself from the bold predictions thread

Just now, SepticeyePoe said:

I wouldn't wish for someone to bust, but grrr... freaking browns

I hope he's a bust against us, if he wants to destroy the Bengals and Steelers I'm all for it