gekaap

A total 762 words, and the first 340 were completely superfluous. Looking for a cheap way to pad your production numbers? This kind of stuff is why so many people think that sports and intelligence are mutually exclusive.

Brandon Stokley

Trade Flacco for Smith.

Special teams is bad? They had one bad game, but special teams has been perhaps the strongest phase of our game this year.

Part of the problem is that Flacco waits too long for things to "develop" when they were never there in the first place. Flacco consistently makes poor decisions and fixates. He makes the decision that he's going to throw to certain target, and when the defense has it shut down he waits for it to open up. In the meantime, routes that were open have now been sewn up. Everyone thought so much of Flacco completing 21 passes in a row. By and large, those were short to medium passes that Flacco got rid of quickly. This coaching staff needs to get it through their heads that looking for that one exciting play isn't going to win football games. We need to play smart, strategic, balanced football. Otherwise we're this is going to continue to be yet another mediocre year.

Splendid idea. Let's do more of what we're failing at. Flacco is missing deep balls left and right. I'm sure more incompletions will solve all our problems. Why can't these fools understand that expecting more from Flacco is the problem, not the solution.

So THAT's why they cut him. Took a gamble, and it paid off. Glad Forsett will have the chance to make some extra pocket change in reward for his loyalty.

Foolish. The return of Flacco is nowhere near as important as the improvement of the offensive line. Flacco is nothing without a great line. Our line is performing very well. The addition of Stanley is proving invaluable. All three Ravens QBs are performing quite well, thanks in large part to a very strong O-line. Flacco could retire tomorrow and everything would be fine.

Sometimes you take a shot when there's low risk involved. You talk like signing him hurt us somehow. A potentially high talent at a low price. Nothing to lose, everything to gain. It didn't work out, so now we cut him loose. We have lost nothing.

Wait a second....since when did anyone take Amateur Football Focus seriously? All they ever do is create pop fodder content based on national craze. I'm not sure their people even watch football, I think they just look up stuff on Wikipedia and scrape together whatever nonsense they can manage. They're almost as laughable as that Sarah Ellison.

What surprises me is that a trade couldn't be worked out. I mean, seriously, what could the Giants have been offering which was less valuable than cutting him outright and getting nothing? Doesn't seem to make much sense.

Actually, there's nothing in common about the two scenarios. Not a single thing.

Durable? He was placed on IR last season. Yeah, so was Flacco.

Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall reading about fans upset w/ the Weddle signing. Oh, I remember it happening. I'd bet it was mostly the same malcontents who were whining all throughout the draft.

Actually, I do need to argue with four Lombardi trophies: The man has built his entire career on a string of repeated cheating scandals. As for post season wins being an argument for Flacco's eliteness, that's even more stupid than calling Belicheat a great coach. I'll buy Harbaugh being in the top 5 NFL coaches. But if you're going to write an article built on a nonsense premise like that, then don't even bother next time. Because, all you're doing is writing with the same superficial, unknowing lack of understanding and vision as the article you're complaining about. Just like USA Today, you're cranking out mindless fodder for the consumption of Leviathan feed stock.