ravensnick

Members
  • Content count

    5,155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by ravensnick


  1. 10 minutes ago, raven94 said:

    Then don't. There's a decent chance he's there at our 2nd. The only problem I have with him is his core strength isnt very good which is common for taller guys. Other than that he'd be an extremely good player in baltimore. Much better version of Paul Kruger and even Jarret Johnson 

    The only comparison he has to those two guys is that he is white. I love JJ knock em out style of run defense, but he was pretty much a non factor as a pass rusher. Kruger being the polar opposite of that. His play style and talent is leaps and bounds above both.

    1

  2. 4 minutes ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

    I'm sorry, what I meant to say was besides the obvious 3 of Garrett, Allen, and foster. I think he could be the best after those 3 lol

    As much as I think Barnett and Riddick are going to be really good, I can get behind this.

    0

  3. 1 minute ago, LosT_in_TranSlatioN said:

    Lmao. The 40 is the most overrated combine stat by far. Cook plays much faster than that. And Fournette does too. And he did it at 240 pounds.

    Just a yearly reminder. 

    *unless a player does a lot worse or a lot better than projected, like Vontaze Burfict or Chris Johnson

    0

  4. 18 minutes ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

    I get the feeling that watt ends up the best front seven defender from this class. I'm sure plenty would have been called crazy for suggesting the same of his brother too. 

    Hes got ridiculous length, plays pretty refined with only a year starting under his belt, plays super strong for someone so long and lanky, good bend, great intensity, solid burst, I just think he's gonna end up a beast but I can't justify taking him at 16

    I highly doubt he ends up being a better play than Garrett. Garrett is what everyone hyped up Clowney to be, with actual production in college.

    0

  5. 21 minutes ago, hn68wb4 said:

    Not a super fast RB class, but a few of these guys play faster than they timed here, including the top 2 Fournette and Cook

    Well Fournette did show up heavier his playing weight at 240 lbs, so that's not surprising

    0

  6. 17 minutes ago, ravensnation5220 said:

    I must say, I'm pretty disappointed with cooks 4.5 40. 

    I definitely wouldn't say disappointed because that's still a very solid time, but I figured he'd be a 4.43-7 guy

    0

  7. 4 minutes ago, trevorsteadman said:

    Yeah Torrey Smith was 4.36. Over a tenth of a second faster.

    I apparently have really crappy memory, I swore he ran in the late 40s for some reason.

    1

  8. 23 minutes ago, hn68wb4 said:

    RB 40 is about to start, who do you think will run the fastest time? I think Cook has a shot, he should have one of the fastest splits, his acceleration is unreal.

    100% McCaffery, at least for RBs. He's a bit lighter than Cook,

    0