I don't have any problem with Brent's assessment of the draft 'youth movement'. There is a possibility that some of our drafted player's potential may never be reached, but that can't be characterized as "...draft poorly". For the most part no matter where you draft in the 1st 4 rounds it's a total roll of the dice with a little intuition and science sprinkled on top.
When you look at the fact that our Ravens have always been placed in the top 5 (or very least top 10) in drafting since the Oz era collectively, consistently by a large majority of NFL experts, the last 4 years don't change that at all. 'Depth' crisis? 4-0 in the preseason matching-up against other teams draft classes.
What Brent has seemed to leave-out is that it's chess - not checkers even when it goes as planned. There are some guys drafted specifically to fill the back-up roles (injuries, trades, suspensions, etc.). They can't really be assessed for lack of play. There are some that aren't played because of scheme changes before they even hit training camp. They have to be coached-up to fit those changes. Lastly, there are 2-3-4 year plans that sometimes pro-bowlers can emerge from based on retirements in free agency. Poor drafting - way to early to determine. There are very few pro-bowl caliber players from the last 4 draft classes and we have 2 and potentially 3 (with Stanley). Out of the last 4 classes - several aren't even on the teams that drafted them, injured or are on teams buried DOA.
Roll the dice, baby.