DomMcRaven

A number of posters say that. Because I have no idea about him, why would you say he'd be good with Flacco. Just curious that's all.

You gotta be kidding me. Are they really that teflon?

If anything, JUST WIN!

Speaking of teams who beat the Jets, the Bengals are gonna play without Eifert AS WELL?! Bungles gonna Bungle, but they'll play SB contenders in week 17 you just watch. I'm so sickened right now.

To play devil's advocate, I don't believe our defense will get the job done against the Steelers and Bengals nor do I think our road offense will have that "breakout game" when it'll matter the most.

Should Marty be gone, I'd like someone from the college ranks (I have no idea who though).

Excellent points. I remember seeing somewhere we were top 5 in most offensive line combinations for awhile now (not sure where we stand at this very juncture). That along with him coming off that injury didn't help at all. I really think this offseason and the following season is going to be crucial like no other. Not just for the offense as a whole, but for the team. If we miss the playoffs next season (assuming we miss this year's as well), I think it's very likely that Harbs will be gone.

Why would Smith want to downgrade like that? The Bucs are building something special, but then again, this reminds me of Kubiak saying he wanted to stay here and build a foundation on offense. We know the rest of the story.

Tell me about it. It's like we can not have offensive prosperity for more than a year. Frustrating to say the least.

Literally turned the game to see the Dolphins winning 27-10. First play I see is of course is a Dolphins TD. I really hope we blow out the Jets the next time we play them.

It really isn't. I'm a big Flacco fan myself, but I know he can be REALLY erratic. I just accept it for what it is and just hope the FO can build an offense around him that'll be similar to 2014 when it was a top 10 scoring offense.

This according to @EdTheMythicalOne: "From day one the Ravens were an offense first team under Billick and was one that could move the chairs."

I trust them A LITTLE BIT more at home. Just a little bit.

After performing research, I definitely think she's a Ravens fan. It's not like I'd watch NFL Network for her football analysis. I was having a convo with @Ravensfan23 about how much we really don't care about what the media/talking heads say for the most part. While I can't speak for him, I can say that what Amber said is another example of why we don't.

Tbh, I don't think they even believed that (IMO of course). If I recall correctly, I don't think anything was doing well on that offense prior to the "on to Cincinnati" game.

You know something, the more I think about it, the more I'm convinced he has NEVER played a bad game in his NFL career.

That's how I see it. This offense just can't be trusted on the road especially since the Steelers defense tends to play better at home (heck they've been playing better as of late regardless). Calm before the storm.

Not even that QB who plays in Massachusetts? That guy right there can't do anything wrong in the media's eyes.

Well......at least she's a Ravens fan so she's cool with me.

Of course he is! I knew I hated them for a reason.

To be fair, it IS Bama. And LSU's QB situation is.....well....yeah (for quite some time since Mettenberger was there). However, I agree, I don't want him either considering CB, pass-rusher and WR are far bigger needs than RB.

We better.

I just hope for once they won't let me down, but they will because.......yeah.

The question is: can the Bengals be useful for a chance?

Thanks for nothing Upshaw.