FlackAttack

sure, when wearing all black uniforms.

glad? no way. not sure about you guys, but I do not like the ravens prime time. maybe one or two games tops. they are not a prime time team. also to the guy preaching that Denver is not on the coast. thanks for clarifying what we all learned in 3rd grade geography.

this looks like another 9-7 wildcard year. we'll squeeze in at the end like we always do with those late season home games.

LOL, dont even get me started on Elam.

this is true. the people that post on this board hate the truth, judging from your down votes and the ones ill likely get from this post, they make it so obvious and wear their heart on they sleeve LOL.

you have more a chance of getting struck by lightning twice, then ravens picking up crabtree

which was exactly my original point. thanks for clarifying.

this post cant be serious. dude, we were up by 14 points TWICE. the patriots rushed for 14 YARDS the whole game. tom brady LIT UP our secondary from beginning to end. he was having target practice against our secondary for 60 minuets straight. so far as cheating, i assume you are talking about the receiver subbing, which i believe was only for what.. one drive? lol

this kid obviously didnt see the 2014 divisional playoff game our defense played against tom brady.

^this. playing against brady and manning, those safeties will get smoked.

over half those guys will be there in he 3rd and 4th round. that was originally my point and exactly what bisciotti stated in his draft plan.

exactly. nick o'leary could be a beast, maxx williams and clive walkford could be a beast too. to say theres "weak talent" is simply showing a lack of knowledge of this position. ive heard countless espn analysts stating all these TE's can come in and produce first year. just the other day an analyst was going off about Nick Boyle out of DE, who could be a steal. underrated big body that can block as well as catch, and had a great senior bowl. check 'em out.

Nobody said anything about TE talent being better than the WR talent. What smart people like me and my client Steve Bisciotti are saying is we need a TE more than we need a WR. Just because theres more talent at WR doesnt mean we go straight to WR first. SMH.

you are trying waayyyy too hard, man lol. theres much more talent in the draft than free agency at TE. all 10 of these guys can come in and produce year one for us. take it up with nfl writers if you still think there is weak talent at TE. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000479892/article/2015-nfl-draft-lance-zierleins-top-10-tight-ends

Exactly what i posted 2 weeks ago in the Aiken/ Brown thread.

Key word, Sign. We can still make trades. So far as Housler goes, it would be a nice pick up but I wont lose sleep if we dont. He will obviously go wherever the money is. We can draft a TE no problem. Theres lots of talent at that position this year.

you look anywhere else besides this website people will say the same exact thing about this signing. you guys simply need to remove your purple shades every once in awhile.

exactly. hes just saying these things that anybody in the tail end of their career would want to say to the media after a big signing on his part. "compete", "coach", "lean on", LOL

do you think if matt schaub were to back up aaron rodgers, peyton manning, drew brees or tom brady, they would "lean on him" and "learn from him"? LOL

from our website, thats written by a local sports journalists thats paid to praise everything we do. you're never going to see an article criticizing anything this organization does on our website. the truth hurts you doesnt it? do you really think Flacco is going to "lean on" schuab? use common sense man.

sure, he'll help with the 2nd and 3rd stringers, im not denying that. but to go as far as saying he'll help coach the system, thats just LOL.

half of this thread has been people posting about how much schaub will "help the system" because he "knows the system" and he will "coach the system". hes getting paid to stand around and hold a clipboard. the only relevance he'll have with this "system" is if (knock on wood) flacco does down. even then, how confident how are you with the guy? he got cut from the raiders in favor of derek carr. LOL. to answer your first question, I have more faith in trestman and morningweig than matt schaub, if you would rather have matt schuab preaching knowledge to Joe then wow, no wonder you dont work for the NFL.

you think matt schaub is going to coach flacco. just sit down and think about that one for a second. LOL!

lol @ people stating "he knows the system". hes a 2nd string qb, not an offensive coordinator or qb coach. flacco will learn everything from trestman, morhinweg and past experience. not schaub lol.

I dont understand this signing. After reading Matt Schaub was on the market I thought "oh he might be a good pickup". Once we signed him and saw that it was 1 year for 3mil I thought, "wow what a terrible pickup". Joe Flacco has started every game in his 7 year career. Why go out and spend so much money on a backup all of a sudden? Especially when we are so tight against cap? And we are in dire need of other positions like TE, WR, DB, etc?? Really doesn't make any sense. I'm scratching my head with this one.