Wisdom

Members
  • Content count

    507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wisdom


  1. 2 minutes ago, flynismo said:

    It's only common among idiots. Sorry

    When I used the word idiot.  I was penalizes 5 points.  However, you seem to use it at will and nothing happen.  I guess you must be part of the "I love me some Flacco forum  or perhaps, you want just want to be cuddled" by your team mates.  Whatever, the reasons your comments are rude and ridiclous.

    2

  2. 2 minutes ago, rmcjacket23 said:

    1. Accepting the penalty was the smart move. The defense giving up a 3rd and 17, followed by jumping offsides on a hard count like some 10th graders, followed by giving up another 20 yards for a TD was the problem. Basically 11 guys actively trying to suck.

    2. True, but it was Joe who was hitting his receivers left and right in the hands last week and the ball simply falling to the ground for some odd reason, just like it was Joe who put it on a dime to Perriman in the corner for the game winning score.

    He can't throw passes to himself. I guess Trestman could take him with him, but I'm not the type of fan who enjoys being the Buffalo Bills for a decade either. I guess that's your own personal prerogative. 

    Oh, here you go again.  I knew it would be only a matter of seconds before you and a few others come of calling.  LOL, Hilarious. 

    0

  3. They can make Trestman the scapegoat if they want to but it wasn't Trestman who accepted the penalty against the raiders and it wasn't Trestman who called for the fake field goal with Tucker lined up on the opposite side.......it was Harbaugh.........and it wasn't Trestman throwing the ball high and late to receivers a few yards in front him it was slow below average Flacco....

    You guys talked out of both sides of your mouth always looking for a scapegoat for the Ravens inept offense.  Seems to me the common denominator in the Cam and Trestman firing is none other than Flacco.   It's a shame trestman didn't take flacco with him!

     

    -5

  4. On 10/6/2016 at 6:17 PM, Virginia 55 said:

    Flacco has maybe two good seasons in his entire career.  He is actually slightly below average.  He is a game manager, that needs a lot of work on his mid range throws.  His average passes is 6.3 that means he is a glorified check down guy with an occasional deep ball (that he throws pretty well).

    If we are honest with ourselves, he cant make players great, because he is not good enough to do it. 

    Excellent point.

    0

  5. 4 hours ago, Ravenseconbeast said:

    In other words, Joe Flacco can do no wrong.  

    I'm sure come Sunday the stats will be vividly clear how bad Flacco is. Oakland like Redskins are terrible when it comes to getting QB.   Flacco make it very easy for any defense to tee off of him.  Why?  1) Zero pocket awareness

     2) inability to check the field other than eyeing on 1target

     3) Zero ability to build rapport with younger younger receivers(how many times have you seen flacco come up big other than SSS/pitta at pressure time? The whole defense already know where the ball is going come clutch time) 

    4) zero ability to read defensive scheme

    5) horribly inconsistent throws(A LA the underthrow/overthrow king) 

     yet you would have an excuse why blame should be put on everyone but  Flacco. 

    Looking at the stat,  Flacco stands pretty clear he is one of the worst QB in the league right now.  Right there with the rest of the losers @'worst 5'.   

      

    You're absolutely on point.   The only thing Flacco does with any consistency is collect a paycheck.  Other than that he is horrible.

    0

  6. 10 minutes ago, Raving_Heathen said:

    Tucker is a beast, but anyone saying they trust him (or any kicker) to kick a 68-yarder over Flacco to get us into better FG range is obviously blindly biased. Way more times than not in the past, Flacco's been clutch in these kinds of situations.

    As a result of the final outcome....was he clutch?  In all the games played thus far this year he has been average and sometimes below.

    0