Wacko4Zacko

Members
  • Content count

    4,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Wacko4Zacko


  1. I'm mixed on his return. I don't mind Lesnar coming back, I don't mind Rock coming back. In terms of Batista, I'm just like, I can do with or without him. Then again, I'm a Daniel Bryan fan so I don't want to see Bryan pushed down the card because of Batista when he truly deserves the Rumble win and to have his WM moment at WM 30. 

     

    I wouldn't be surprised to see Orton retain against Cena in some screwy finish, he leaves Elimination Chamber with the title. Bryan wins the Rumble and then faces Orton at WM and gets his redemption over Orton after everything those two did last summer.

     

    Im a Daniel Bryan fan too and I hope he wins, but he has a singles match with Bray Wyatt, so i doubt he will be in the rumble unless they do the thing where you wrestle twice on rumble night.

    0

  2. I said this somewhere else, but honestly I think our OC vacancy is the most sexy to any candidate. I feel like the OC most attractive opening, better then Lions or Browns head coaching vacancy(before being filled by Caldwell.) Any one who gets hired will be walking into a very good job with the right pieces, like in other words I feel like most coaches wouldnt mind taking the job because of the pieces they get to work with and yes obviously have plenty to work with. So to me I dont see how its not getting much attention or popular around league, its a great opening to be filled.

    0

  3. I'll be interested in seeing who wins it. The WWE seems to want to push either Roman Reigns or Bray Wyatt but I wouldn't be surprised to see Daniel Bryan win it. He's beyond over with the fans at this point. Last Monday was amazing. 

     

     

     
    I kinda think batista will unfortunately win it or maybe a returning Sheamus. Regardless a Face is winning the rumble
     

     

     

    As far as Batista, I could also see him winning to Rumble but I ultimately think he's back for Lesnar at Mania. 

    Do you guys really think WWE will push Batista and advertise his return like this and have him lose the rumble? Wouldnt that damage his character and his popularity? He will be over and on a hot streak I cant see him returning and then being buried in the rumble.

    0

  4. Getting their best player back won't make a difference to them?

    They're still going to suck but they will be better than losing 9/10

    Who knows how he will be and how he will produce and I meant it in the aspect of wont matter to the Celtics  because they arent a title contender either way.

    0

  5. Actually he will be bringing the "same" offense. It's the same offense he ran in Washington with McNabb and Rex, only difference is he was able to make some tweaks to fit what his current player does well. The principles of the offense doesn't change. No Flacco won't be running the read option, but if you look at the times Kirk Cousins played, neither did he.

     

    The offense doesn't change, the design does and that's something I really like about him because he's able to adapt to what personnel he is given unlike some other coaches we've had.

    Thats basically what I meant but you said it in more clearer way which made more sense after rereading what I said, but yeah point is Shanahan wont being doing the read with Flacco and Rice and tats what I wa shearing as a concern from some of younger fans, so as long as that is cleared up that is what I was aiming for. +1 for you my friend

    0

  6. I just want to clarify because it was just brought to my attention that some of younger fans who may not understand this yet. Kyle Shanahan would not be bringing same offense he used in Washington, so if that is why you dislike him please dont because you are misunderstood. I was listening to some kids in my local mall and also I have hard it on radio as well on 105.7 the fan. Shanahan wont be making Rice and Flacco run with the ball like Griffin and Morris. It would be a completely different offense than what you saw in Washington. Just thought this should be cleared up.

    2

  7. I wouldn't be opposed to interviewing him, only to tell him at the end of the interview that he has been fired. The guy is a waste. He's not even that great at developing WR talent. I just don't see how anyone can consider him a legit possibility as OC. If he becomes the next OC, you can go ahead and skip watching the team next year. If you thought this past year was horrible, wait till next season.

     

    I dont think he should be fired but I agree he isnt the answer to the OC. Two big thumbs down for Holster.

     

    A blind squirrel still finds a nut or two. What about the rest of the receivers he was supposed to be developing, other than Torrey??

     

    I agree Torrey should of had more attention to be deveoped, but as for marlon a nut or two more then Doss or Streeter, better than none in my opinion.

    0

  8.  

    When the Ravens traded Boldin they had to believe that  one or two of their  young receivers were going to step their game up along with Torrey Smith and Jacoby Jones . I think you can basically say that Ozzie and a John challenge Hostler because they had high expectation for Doss, Reed (when he was here),Thompson,, Williams(when he was here), and Streeter(when he was here) to fill in that number 3 spot but none them  really step up . I know Reed and Thompson was dealing with some injuries but through out training camp  none of the young receivers step up which led to them signing Stokley . I know some of that can be the fault of the players but it also has to be the fault of the coach as well and I think  Hostler would have lost  the challenge or maybe his job if Marlon Brown didnt  play the way he did last season.

     

      

    And along came Marlon brown who succeeded farther then any Of those receiver's.

    1