ArsenalRaven666

1 minute ago, Crabcakes&Football said:

Bollocks.

I gave you a like as it wasnt censored

Well that sucks ..... Trade back a couple of spots

Just now, A Fish Called Yanda said:

They would be stupid to.  Per trade chart, we should get their 33rd pick of this draft.

If titans can still get the OT they wanted Tunsil/Stanley we could get their 1st and two 2nds.  they will still have gained a 3rd this year and 1st 3rd next

Yes Elliott to cowboys .... now Ramsey needs to get passed Jags

Hope cowboys take elliott ... think it will be ramsey

Everything is a smokescreen.

If a team wanting a player (QB RB OT DE etc) there will be either a team before them that wants them or we tell them we have them highly rated

QB .. If teams want Lynch they may well need to move up to our spot to jump the 49ers

RB .. If cowboys pass on Elliott then teams like Dolphins, Raiders will need to get ahead of Giants.

I think the chargers will have the biggest influence as to who falls to us as they could go 3 ways in draft Tunsil, Ramsey or Buckner (hope they go Buckner).
The Cowboys have another linebacker suspended in Lawrence so think they select Bosa or Ramsey. Jags will likely go Ramsey if there or Jacks (if they are ok with his medical) see them trying to trade down.

Would leave us with choice of two from Tunsil Buckner or Jacks. Behind them Hargreaves/Stanley/Elliott there after them I believe there is a drop off in talent. So for me wouldnt trade out of top 10

More realistic would be our 1st 2nd for their 1st 2nd (33) 2nd (43) and the Rams 3rd next year.

That said if they were going to take Tunsil at no1 and slipped to us at 6 they may be willing to include both 2nds in trade.  They would have saved cap space (cheaper drafting at 6) gained a 3rd this year with Rams 1st 3rd next and still got the same guy.  I would even give them our low 4th for the Rams 3rd next year.

4 minutes ago, allblackraven said:

I get that but in my mind jumping from 10th to 6th while giving two 2nd rounders as well is still overpaying.

From 15 to 6 ... but i agree would be overpaying

The Rams pick no1 was worth 3000pts they gained approx 2100pts worth of picks this year, where they gain is with the Rams 1st & 3rd next draft. 

Should the Rams tank and end with the no1 pick would be 3270pts meaning a gain of 2370pts.

Finish in same spot 15th would be 1260 gaining 1160pts on the deal.

Win the superbowl 700pts up around 600pts .... ok getting silly now

As long as we dont go lower then 10th I would be happy.
Goff Wentz Ramsey Bosa Jack ... would still leave Tunsil Buckner Hargreaves Stanley Elliott or Treadwell.

The Titans traded out of 1st simply because of the value offered to them by the Rams. If Tunsil was going to be their pick and fell to 6th I believe they could try to trade back up and certainly have the picks. It would probably cost them a 1st 2nd and 3rd next but would still get their guy, gain a 2nd 3rd this year and rams 1st next. Drafting at 6 is also cheaper too

8 minutes ago, balfan23 said:

I agree about there being a decent chance that Tunsil falls to us ... but I don't agree that we'll have a hard choice on selecting him or trading back. If he's still there, I think he's going to be a Raven. 

Would really depend on what was offered to trade back and wouldnt drop below 10th now.  

We would still be able to get one of Tunsil Stanley Buckner Hargreaves or Elliott along with multiple picks

32 minutes ago, RavensFanMania said:

I believe the draft is going to fall like this....

1.  Rams - Goff

2. Browns - Wentz

3. Chargers - Tunsil

4. Cowboys - Ramsey

5. Jaguars - Jack

6. Ravens - Bosa

I think this is what is going to happen and I'd be ecstatic.

If Chargers go Tunsil I agree with your board,

I do think Chargers could go with Ramsey having lost Weddle,  with a high 2nd they could address OT with Spriggs/Ifedi/Coleman.  If this happens I believe Tunsil could fall to us at 6 and would have the hard choice of selecting him or trading back

27 minutes ago, JoeyFlex5 said:

I said Myles Jack idk why it's deleted lol. 

Maybe it was because you had Jack and off next to eachother lol

With the Rams moving to LA and wanting the fanfare of the no.1 pick I think they will go with Goff.

If that is the case I dont think it affects what the Browns do as i think they have Wentz higher, the issue is if they take a QB or not.

Regardless we will have a shot at Bosa Jack Tunsil Buckner or Ramsey falling to us.

If Pitta can come back fully fit with no hip issues i see this as a good thing him coming back. With Pitta restructuring his deal and cutting Ford we should open up some more cap space

Dream draft for me is for SF to trade up a spot to take the QB they want to prevent others jumping them.

Would exchange our 1st(6) 3rd(70) 4th(130) to SF for their 1st(7) 3rd(68) 4th(105) picks whilst gaining both 5ths (142 145).  For those who go with a trade chart there is only 1.3pts difference in this trade in benifit of the Ravens, with four 6th round picks (two tradeable) we could get more.

24 minutes ago, usmccharles said:

Hence why it would be a nightmare for me....

Haha well someone doesnt agree and negged me for saying that with those running backs I dont want to draft another one high.

Not sure if they are a Henry fan or just dont like our current runningbacks.

1 hour ago, usmccharles said:

drafting Henry

With Forsett Allen West Teliaferro Richardson we are loaded we are at RB, drafting another one high would be a mistake.

West and Richardson have reportedly worked hard to get in better shape this offseason.

41 minutes ago, thieverycorporation said:

Thanks I didn't analysis the pick order. Appreciate it.

I use this http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=Bal

The point chart does show you what you would expect as a rough guide in trades but it comes down to more of a need for teams either team to move.

49 minutes ago, Somerset Ravens said:

Round 1.   Ronnie Stanley

Round 2.   Jaylon Smith

Round 3.   Braxton Miller

If we traded down in the 1st round to gain another 2nd I would take Jaylon Smith with the lower one.

He is currently ranging to be going anywhere from end of 1st to some mocks in the 4th ... Really will come down down to how his knee is.

2 hours ago, thieverycorporation said:

I'd play him at safety with the ability to cheat up into box/zon/blitz. He'll need to add bulk muscle to play pure lb. Hybrids have enormous potential. He's certainly in my crosshairs and conversation. I'm taking him in the early/mid second with the extra pick via trade down. 

Hargreaves in the first at 8.

Shepard early second

Cravens with second second.

 

Trading down from 6th to 8th would likely only net a 3rd, the Eagles also dont have a 2nd rounder.  We would have to trade down to Miami to realistically net a 2nd unless someone was desparate to trade up.

Tunsil Ramsey Bosa Jack or trade back.

12 minutes ago, Somerset Ravens said:

A realistic value for moving up from 8 to 6 would be the Eagle's 3rd round pick this year.

The point cost of moving from 8 to 6 is 200pts by chart, the two eagle 3rd rounders are worth 195 and 205pts each making it realistic.

I personally think we could get more then that given they are jumping the 49ers for a QB, a bidding war would be nice