True. It's MORE than just suspect though. It's outright horrendous. There have been a number of retired refs in the past who've publically stated that they favored their favorite teams/players. They've said that if they mistakenly penalized a team, they would wait a few plays to make another BS, ticky-tack call to "balance" it out - as if that really works. The main issue is that the tome that is the NFL rule book is so bloated with legaleze to define every aspect of the game that your almost literally have to be a lawyer in order be an official, a coach, or, at the least, a paralegal as a player. Then try and apply ALL of that info at game-speed. It's an absolutely ludicrous prospect. Then there is the who cheating debate. There's always been suspicions of bookies paying underhanded refs to shave points so teams cover the spread or win outright. They are part time employees and could therefore, be easily tempted with the prospect of more money. NOW that these one week fanatasy leagues are spriniging up everywhere there is even more opportunity and motive for them to cheat than before. The NFL has arrived at a CROSSROADS. It is either going to have to dramatically pare back these rules and let the players play and (like the UFC) give the refs more judgement on calls surrounding player safety (i,e, make them a full time NFL employee with a salary that makes them professional and uncorruptable), OR, Start phasing out the imperfect human element in favor of more cameras and sensors to make the calls as absolute as the league wants them to be. In this day and age the technology is there to put them in balls, helmets, unis, pylons and posts and turf down to the 1" lines of every field. Even at an expense of $1-3 million per stadium, that is a trifling amount to the loss of integrity perceived by NFL fans and sponsors who WILL eventually spend their time and money elsewhere if they feel their team lost on poor officiating.