RavensPunkXVX

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,464

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RavensPunkXVX

  1. Posted · Report post

    1 minute ago, rmw10 said:

    Unless my remaining 3 go on a run here in the second half of these games, it looks like @allblackraven is going to knock me out.  My team took a dump these past 2 weeks compared to what they had been doing all year.

    That's what makes fantasy football so fun, unless you're on the other end as you were. But it can be unpredictable. Looks like the top two seeds might fall if it all plays out as is. @allblackraven and @Ravensfanspls

    0

  4. Posted · Report post

    5 hours ago, EdTheMythicalOne said:

    And if you don't make the play, tear off your helmet, chuck it down the field 15 yards or so, kick something nearby like a stray football, then walk off the field and go cry about it in the corner. Because that's how you should handle adversity. Don't work on it to get better. Just go sulk about it after you throw a temper tantrum that would rival a three year old's.

    Hilarious. A dude has a little fire in him so you break it down as a tantrum. He's a fierce competitor, sometimes it's okay to let it out. Maybe he should write Joey a strongly worded letter next time. 

    1

  5. Posted · Report post

    6 hours ago, gtalk12 said:

    Bradys 400 was deceiving because of 1 blown coverage play, otherwise we did a great job on him.....the how is irrelevant. I can not fault a team for taking advantage of a situation, it is what you are suppose to do. Flacco and company did not do a good enough job moving the ball down the field, every nice gain on the ground felt like it was negated by a holding call, how many times did they force Flacco into a 2nd and long or 3rd and long thanks to holding calls?

     

    Special teams did what they were suppose to do, and injected life into Flacco and the offense and they took advantage.

    I'm not faulting the offense because of what the special teams did. I'm just saying prior to that, we were held scoreless, seemingly unable to move the ball into the red zone. I'm saying it was a very short field, not like he smoothly and methodically moved the team down the field. That's the deceit I was referring to. 

    He was efficient, but was throwing those shorter routes, and it's not too difficult to miss those passes to your backs. He had a decent game, but if someone came up to me and said, "I saw Flacco had a pretty great night," Id argue the fact.

    TDs and yardage don't really tell the tale, at least not for me. If you actually watch the game, you can be the judge of how well he played. Once again, I fully support Flacco, but his play wasn't that good.

    1

  6. Posted · Report post

    1 hour ago, reed20 said:

    Flacco had 324 yards 2 TDs 1 INT. He was moving the ball down the field. It was the defense that gave up a huge play then couldnt get off the field when blount was getting the ball yet people blame Joe?

    Defense and special teams lost this game.

    Overall though we played one of the best teams in the league and made it competitive when it should have been a blow out.

    I'm a supporter of Flacco, but those stats are deceiving. Those two TDs were set up because of our special teams, since you mentioned they lost the game for us. And he threw 52 times, he better break 300.

     

    5

  12. Posted · Report post

    19 minutes ago, redlobster said:

    How ironic that footballs biggest sponsor (alcohol) is the result of so many problems but lets suspend guys over marijuana. To clarify I do not smoke weed.

    I'm not gonna go too off topic, but as an individual that studies law, the entire justice system is too harsh on marijuana use and at times it is excessive. However, it's "against the law," whereas alcohol is not, if you're the legal age. Hundreds of thousands are arrested each year on marijuana related charges, but alcohol is shown to be more dangerous, yet it's not illegal so...

     

    But yeah, Floyd has underperformed, but I'd assume he'll be picked up by a potential playoff contender? 

    0

  13. Posted · Report post

    2 minutes ago, 58RAVENS55 said:

    Kirk cousins (vs panthers)

    or 

    Tyrod Taylor (vs Browns) 

    tyrod has the better matchup but there's talk of him getting benched so idk which one to play 

    Panthers have given up a lot in the passing game, but I would keep an eye on Tyrod. Personally I'd use Kirk till the end, more consistent.

    0

  18. Posted · Report post

    Saw a segment on NFL.com, buy or sell, and two analysts are buying the Ravens. One said we lose to Pitt, but beat Philly and Cincinnati and take a wildcard. The other said we beat Pitt and win the division. Some still believe! lol

    These last three are very winnable like every other game the Ravens have been in. I felt like our game against Miami was the POTENTIAL of this offense. The absence of Jimmy hurts, but we clearly need depth at the cornerback position. I'm tired of our secondary being dependent on whether or not Jimmy is healthy. Same goes for wins and losses, all hinges on Jimmy. 

    I think we get back on track against the Eagles and then who knows against Pitt. Should be a good one, as always. 

    0