Thanks. I think it's a fair assessment with perhaps one partial disagreement and that's depth. You are right in what you say about it but I didn't want to draft specific players for specific positions, simply because where I picked, more often than not, drop in quality was significant in comparison to starters. So I tried to put together a team that can trouble others by versatility - giving them lot of different looks and different type of play (on offense in particular) in an attempt to disguise" lack of depth at particular position. As an example - on any given night I'm sure at least one of Allen, Peja, Robinson is bound to get hot from downtown, so I can rest guys. There are two reasons for selecting players from the more recent era with my bottom half picks - apart from the greatest ones which I had an opportunity to watch a lot, I know only what I could read on other (second, third tier) older guys. It was a deliberate choice on my part to pick players who I watched, knowing exactly what they bring and how that looks like on the court. You are correct on the other reason - Kings from early 2000s are "my team". I'd argue that they managed to get better of Shaq and Kobe but Horry was just too much. And the refs. Peja and Divac are my homies from the old country, so there's that, as well. Funny thing is - my favourite player from that team is yet to be selected and he'll be Mr Irrelevant in this draft. I really enjoyed the game - all you guys obviously know a lot about basketball and didn't make it easy on other ten people. I just wish this league was possible and we actually square off in real games. Damn.
