whobilly

Translated. The article is about unloading the top rows of the stadium that are PSL's that have zero value.

Good news. Wallace wants to take more of a leadership role. Bad news. He's the only legitimate WR on the roster.

Perriman can't even get on the field. In his Year II, he wasn't even as good as Torrey was in Torrey's first year- this guy has got to learn how to catch the ball and stay healthy- then he can become, at best, a legitimate #2 or #3 receiver in this league I could accept Perriman's mediocre play if he was a #4 or #5 pick. He was a #1 pick. UNACCEPTABLE.

I'm a Ravens Fan. Have been to a number of NFL stadiums. What is this based on? Because they are going to finally add escalators? With the exception of Lambeau because it is somewhat historic and FedEx in Landover and The Oakland Coliseum being certified dumps, all places are kind of similar.

Key to Running Game Reboot. RUN THE BALL MORE THAN 8 TIMES A GAME.

Tyrod could have helped? Backup QB's play out their four years and sign with another team who over pays them.

Tyrod Taylor was a 6th round pick if I'm not mistaken. Turned out to be a nice, solid and cheap backup for 5 years. And convinced at least Rex Ryan to hire him as a starter. I wouldn't say that is a complete waste of a pick. How many players from other positions have we drafted in 6th or 7th round who wound up starters? Unless you count Camp, who is injured more often than not, I can't name single one. Darren Waller who catches an occasional pass and plays special teams and Sam Koch. That's it.

With the amount of guaranteed money they don't have a choice.

Brady and Taylor do not belong in the same paragraph. Brady was not the norm. Taylor was/is a very mediocre QB.

Every QB can watch these games. They will NOT morph into Brady or Rodgers. There is Brady. There is Rodgers. Then there is everybody else.

The makeup of this team right now is stuck in the mud of mediocrity.

Some other team will over pay Williams.

Don't we? We have Joe Flacco and he's a quality QB right? Not elite or top 5 or arguably not even top 10 by any means, but a quality QB surely. There is Brady. There is Rodgers. Then there is everybody else.

There is Brady. There is Rodgers. Then there is everybody else.

Real easy. There is Brady. There is Rogers. There is everybody else.

Really? You're going Flacco Dilfer? Stop it.

Agreed. Again based on the NFL draft value chart, our 1 and 2 together would get us in the top 10 to around #8. That's in range of a true impact player but like you said, it needs to be "That Guy". This is the one time I wouldn't move up with our 1. I think we can get "that guy" at 16 no matter what if we pick well. While also filling our biggest need. rare. I would bet 100$ at least 7 corners go in the first. And rightly so. Craziest talent at corner in a class that I've seen. King reminds a lot of Revis. I also like Jones, Wilson, and Tabor a lot. Plus there's at least 3 or 4 others. IMO, there will be a shut down/play making corner ava at 16. I think we should package other picks to move back into the first after 16 and add another play maker. A lot of talent in this class Good insight. Thanks.

Firstly Stanley has been a great pick and as many pointed out was graded as the top LT in football the last 6 weeks so he is looking like the LT of the next decade. Also Young and Pierce are part of that class as well getting you at least 5 starters out of this rookie class and we haven't gotten to see yet how our 3rd rounder plays because of an injury and how developmental 2nd rounder looks,after a fullong offseason. So it's easily one of the best if not the best rookie class they have ever had. Let's also note in free agency they got one of the best safeties and there top WR last season so that aspect was clearly successful. If the Ravens come anywhere close to matching that success this offseason then you are looking at a powerhouse next year My bad. Forgot about T Young. Was just looking at the draft picks. Pierce was a undrafted FA and the Weddle and Wallace were solid signings. I referred to Stanley as good for now as I want to see them in the league for a few years before I anoint them as being great. With that said I still have the wait and see approach on our #2, #3, and #5 picks. I still believe Reynolds was a whiff at #6 and will be a practice squad guy at best.

Agree. Williams a good solid player with a few great games. Aiken is a nice receiver/special teams guy. Let another team give him a little more money. Juice, good guy, good player but we need to play FASTER. I'd like to see us get the pass rushers in the earlier rounds. Need to start stocking up in that area as have to have someone step in for Jerrnigan when he gets way over paid by another team and bolts after the 2017 season.

Based on the NFL draft value chart, our #1 and a 3rd round comp packaged together would allow us to move up approximately 2 spots, from #16 to #14. Good point. Just trying to figure out a way we could actually get an "Impact Player" for a change. I might be willing to package our #1 and #2 to move up but only if he is "That Guy". We don't need any additional roster fillers like Correa, Arthur Brown, and other whiffs from the #2 and #3 spots on the board.

He also has Julio Jones.

Yes they had one of the most successful offseasons and drafts in recent memory. Certainly up there for best in franchise history. Based on Judon, Stanley, and Dixon? I'll give you those three are good players(good not great) but I want to see how the #2 and #3 picks turn out before I say it is one of the best in franchise history. The Reynolds pick at #6 looks like wash. Have to see if Chris Moore at #5 can do more than be a Special Teams guy.

Was it Harbs fault that Hester let half the punts bounce in front of him and roll back an additional 20 yards?

I'm not sure that a 3rd round comp is going to move you very far up in the 1st round. From 15, it might get you to 12, but I'm hard pressed to see it move us more than that. Moving up in the 1st round, especially when moving up spots within the top 15, is normally very expensive. It could happen if there is a player that we grade as a tier 1 player is left on the board at around 12 and is the last in that tier AND there is a perceived major drop off between that player and the players in the next tier AND we have a degree of certainty that this player will be selected by the remaining teams in front of us AND our trade partner has a different evaluation of that player. I think we're open to the concept, but whether that scenario presents itself is probably less than a 50-50 proposition. More than likely, for us to make a significant play in this area, it will cost us our 2nd, which can be tough to swallow. Good points.

We likely are going to receive a 3rd round comp pick for KO. Thoughts on packaging that pick and our #1 to move up to increase our odds of getting an impact player?