There were 529 pass attempts against the Chiefs with Houston playing in nearly all of them, there were 584 pass attempts against the Ravens and Doom most likely saw a lot less passing plays because he only played 603 snaps. To say that Doom rushed for 90% of his snaps is far stretch as if teams don't try to trick Ravens with running plays while Doom is in game or try passing plays with Upshaw in the game. Opposing teams plan plays according to who is on the field on the other side and will try to use plays that expose Ravens weakest spots, am sure Upshaw saw plenty of passing plays as teams were gunning for the secondary when injuries tore apart the secondary. Your last paragraph makes no sense to me, bottom line for me no matter how you try to use your logics is that Doom is part time, and Houston is full time and yearly salary comparison is a moot point because of snap counts. To further illustrate Doom is a better player, out of 603 plays, Doom had 17 sacks and 36 total tackles (Assist and Solo), he had his hand in 11.37% of plays. Houston had 22 sacks and 68 tackles which translate into having a hand in 11.47% of plays. Dumervil is 5 years older so it is not realistic for Dumervil to be an every down player, same with Suggs. Speaking of Suggs, Suggs has only 7 less tackles than Houston in nearly 200 less snaps. Houston had just one great year in sacks and all of a sudden, there is salary comparison to Dumervil which is ludicrous because Dumervil and Suggs are both better players than Houston, Houston plays more is why but when using percentages, it is obvious both Dumervil and Suggs are better players. Heck, Ray Lewis used to be an every down player and Lewis was a target from several offensive players and he still gets twice as many tackles as Houston. This whole thing started because our Ravens reporters was trying to make salary comparison bigger than it really is without taking any consideration into account. Dumervil is a better pass rusher without a doubt.