stampedehero

I think there are spiteful reporters that were not among the voting committee last year that voted out of spite instead of being unbiased and fair. I bet most of reporters had Suggs, Flacco etc ranked much higher and it only takes a handful of reporters to manipulate the rankings. There is never the same set of reporters voting the top 100 yearly. It makes no sense to drop the Ravens players so far down the list after nearly making the Super Bowl. Yes, you're right, it's a travesty.

your not kidding he deserves better. He did better this year than last year and for him to be at 84? It's the reason I don't watch this. Even with players voting it's still a popularity contest.

I don't really understand how the list was made. It doesn't make sense