Two totally different situations.It was the teams first year in a new city and they could afford to take a project guy and develop him because there were no expectations of making the playoffs and no hope of winning a SB.There are playoff hopes with our HC/QB in place now and the team could've used another piece for a SB run.If the team was rebuilding and felt like Stanley would be the guy moving forward 3-4 years down the road when we're ready to contend for a SB as was the situation back in 96,I would completely understand.That's not the case though and I don't see how drafting Stanley makes us a better team THIS year.I also don't see the team getting another shot at a top ten pick for a LONG time which also wasn't the case in 96.
Plus,even if he does replace Monroe in the future,he's not the instant coffee they said they were looking for.Stanley is not some once in a lifetime talent that you feel forced to draft even though he won't help you in the immediate future because you have a starter at his position..