I'll probably get more down votes, like the post you quoted, but for the bolded, how many of the, let's say, last 10 superbowl teams truly featured a "short, quick, shifty receiver"? I won't be surprised if every one of those teams had one somewhere, but how many actually were a factor? New England is one. I'm not saying it having one won't help. But having a Boldin type helps, having a Torrey type helps, having a Vincent Jackson type helps, etc. My only point has been that it's becoming an overrated comment on here, to me anyway. We don't need one to win and honestly, with people expecting Buck/Forsett to catch some passes, Maxx/Pitta to be featured in this offense, Perriman/Waller to contribute as rookies, and of course Smith Sr. to get his catches (OUT OF THE FREAKING SLOT mostly likely), I don't know why people feel this is needed to be successful.