reed20fence

Members
  • Content count

    1,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Posts posted by reed20fence


  1. Some coaches never change. Others evolve in their outlook and knowledge. Kubiak was a pariah in his last year in Houston for being an extremely risk-averse playcaller and very unimaginative after Arian Foster went down. In fact, in O'Brien's intro presser the Texans' GM said they were happy to finally have a "smart, imaginative, original thinker."
    Unfortunately for the rest of the league, Kubiak was listening. He evolved and added more quirks to his zone run schemes with us and then in Denver adapted the offense to fit around Peyton's dying arm.

    Trestman didn't evolve. His playcalling was bland, unimaginative, and frustratingly unaware of situational needs during large patches of the game. We telegraphed runs in the shotgun and then wondered why the run game wasn't producing. We threw the ball 50+ times routinely out of the gun to where simply man coverage were sufficient to stifle us for quarters on end.

    Hopefully Morningwheg has observed.

    3

  2. Nobody knows what the heck is going on in truth. It's a fun time killer to prognosticate. Even the coaches don't truly know for 100% certainty how to fix the anemic offense. It's not for lack of willingness to take shots on chunk plays. We've got the talent and will. Sometimes the plays just click and other times they don't. That's life. People don't like to acknowledge that any endeavor involving human error can have widely random outcomes.

    Recall how Ray Lewis remembered that Denver game in 2012 where we got blown out and then next week every play was made against the Giants. He said "one game all the mistakes happen, the next week every tackle was made, every pass was caught, every play made - that's just sports, you move on that quickly."

    0

  3. It's just a feeling... but my impression is that we play offense terrified - petrified really, of failure. We don't attack.

    It's like, 1st down - pass play.
    2nd down - didn't complete the pass, 99.9% chance we run the ball so we don't get caught in 3rd and long.
    3rd down - say your Hail Mary's and pray for the best.

    I agree, it is just a really anemic and pedestrian offense. No killer instinct. Just risk mitigation for 60 minutes.

    1

  4. We don't run the ball well because we don't honestly care about running the ball well. If the majority of your run plays are out of the shotgun and a basic run behind the guard or a sweep where every single defender is standing there watching the entire play develop, you really think it's that hard to stop? They've been defending basic runs like that since their peewee days.

    Comparing our commitment to the run game (and I don't blame Trestman, it's a philosophical choice by the team) during Kubiak and after Kubiak is a joke. Kubiak's offense by its very design produces 1,000 yard rushers, and works the passing game out of run plays.

    Right now the only function we envision for running the ball, as a franchise, is to: (1) keep a defense balanced and (2) run the clock if we're winning at the end of the game.

    That is all. And we're 3-0 despite a non-existent run game.

    0

  5. We'll take the W, no matter how ugly.

    We really don't have any committment to running the football well. This is fine, because you clearly don't need to run well to win games.

    I think we envision running the ball as more of a tool to keep a defense balanced and honest, and if necessary, run the clock near the end of the game. However, I don't think the "keeping them honest" idea is working when the vast majority of our run plays are out of the shotgun where every member of the defense can watch the handoff and the front 4 themselves can stuff us for 2 or 3 yards.

    0

  6. The Raven way is to just get on the field and force the other team to account for your talent. Just keep sprinting go routes down the field and force the secondary to respect the deep game. The moment a corner and safety are forced to play over the top of Perriman, he's done his duty to the offense.

    Forcing a safety out of the box widens the gaps that defenders have to cover. It expands the underneath coverage zones the rest of the defense has to account for. The more defender Perriman can force to account for his speed deep, the easier the job gets for the rest of the offense.

    Can't wait!

    1

  7. We can win 16. That's the team's mentality but It's my mentality as a fan as well. And yeah, I know, "be realistic" and what not. But I seriously don't see a team in this league that we can't beat. What was it - 14 out 16 games last season decided by less than 1 score? 9 out of 11 of our losses by less than 1 score?

    All that with a decimated team? I mean hell, just add Sizzle back to the equation alone and the whole tenor of those games changes.

    What then of getting a whole slew of playmakers like Joe, Forsett, SSS, Perriman, Wallace, Weddle and Hester?

    "Experts" are unimaginative lemmings most of the time. They don't realize how stacked this team is until it starts winning.

    0

  8. 8 hours ago, gekaap said:

     

    We've had 3 consecutive years of secondaries that have gotten shredded, years by the way in which, on aggregate, we have a losing record. In those years we've had no serious 2nd starting calibre CB and have stuck an undersized coverted safety with 2 torn acls as our 2nd corner in Webby.

    I wouldn't consider this "nailing everything so far."

    We haven't drafted this high in over a decade and what's the first inkling? Draft a LT and trade back twice to stockpile mediocre players.

    2

  9. "These two guys are going to run to the ball 100 miles per hour every single play,” Head Coach John Harbaugh added. “That’s really important on this defense.”

    OK, that is a great mentality to look for, but no one more exemplifies that in this draft class or in quite a few draft classes, than Scooby Wright. He is the textbook definition of a Raven.

    http://youtu.be/5l4OVGoZayE

    0

  10.   39 minutes ago, surfdude said:

    With all due respect most of you are way too harsh on the picks. None of us have the intel and the know how on who measures up and who doesn't. Most just listen to the talking heads babble about this guy and that guy. Wait 2 years then say this guy was a bust or a stud.

    I've used the same argument for years but we've had some of the league's worst secondaries since the Super Bowl.
    Intel arguments and insider knowledge and blah blah blah are all fine and defensible if you're wiwinni, but ultimately the proof is in the pudding, and our pudding has been terrible.

    winning*

    0

  11. With all due respect most of you are way too harsh on the picks. None of us have the intel and the know how on who measures up and who doesn't. Most just listen to the talking heads babble about this guy and that guy. Wait 2 years then say this guy was a bust or a stud.

    I've used the same argument for years but we've had some of the league's worst secondaries since the Super Bowl.
    Intel arguments and insider knowledge and blah blah blah are all fine and defensible if you're wiwinni, but ultimately the proof is in the pudding, and our pudding has been terrible.

    0

  12.   10 minutes ago, reed20fence said:
      14 minutes ago, DrPuff said:
      33 minutes ago, law215 said:

    I don't feel like the team we have right now is any better than the team last year. Ravens needed impact, game changing players. What OZ decided was more picks, more "guys". We needed a star. Sad to see other teams get it. Taking risk to get blue chip players while we move back to pick 4th and 5th round guys hoping to find a diamond in the rough instead picking up the diamond in front of you. Spence and Buckner will tear up league.

    They have watched hundreds hours of tape. They know what value they are getting. Youve watched a 2 minute youtube video and listened to Mel "overraction" Kiper. Ill trust ozzie who has 2 Rings. Monday morning GMs. SMH

    No, we watched 3 seasons worth of bad secondaries toppoed of by a 5-11 team just last year.

    we did have 20 players go on ir

    How many starters in the secondary were on IR last year?

    0

  13.   21 minutes ago, law215 said:

    I don't feel like the team we have right now is any better than the team last year. Ravens needed impact, game changing players. What OZ decided was more picks, more "guys". We needed a star. Sad to see other teams get it. Taking risk to get blue chip players while we move back to pick 4th and 5th round guys hoping to find a diamond in the rough instead picking up the diamond in front of you. Spence and Buckner will tear up league.

    They have watched hundreds hours of tape. They know what value they are getting. Youve watched a 2 minute youtube video and listened to Mel "overraction" Kiper. Ill trust ozzie who has 2 Rings. Monday morning GMs. SMH

    No, we watched 3 seasons worth of bad secondaries toppoed of by a 5-11 team just last year.

    0

  14. I think Jack dropped in part because of the 5th year option that 1st round picks get. No use investing that in a guy that self admittedly is down on his longevity.

    I really really like Mckenzie Alexander. He's way mature past his 22 years and is an excellent shut down corner. I don't care about the lack of picks.

    Also, I think Scooby Wright is worth a 3rd rd pick and not his 4th rd grade.

    0

  15. Frame it in terms of tangibles and the story changes. How many outcomes could have been changed if we had a rock solid blind side protector for Joe? Starting from game 1, if Joe has someone that could buy even an extra second of pocket time against a DeMarcus Ware or Von Miller, how many more completions does he make to alter the tone of the game? Even on the last two plays where SSS dropped his floater and Joe had to immediately go to the seam with Gillmore with a lob that got picked, maybe if he had time he coulda made a better pass?
    All the way down to the last play where Joe had Hurst pushed into his knee and tore his acl, maybe that doesn't happen to a bigger bodied LT or a guy that's more aware of the situation and finishing his block on a play.
    LTs are just as important in the complex interconnection that makes a team as a playmaking WR or LB.

    2

  16. It feels like this year's playoffs just didn't have the same level of competitiveness due to some really devastating injuries. Everyone could tell that at least 2 of the teams had no business being in the playoffs period. The Texans proved to be a joke, and they have the guy that hurt Andrew Luck to thank for their berth. And the Redskins squeezed in because Tony Romo and Dez Bryant were missing for chunks of time. KC was a Cinderella story but everyone knew that losing Charles and having mediocre WRs was eventually going to catch up to them.

    Had we not had half our salary cap on IR for about half the season, I firmly believe this could have been another year of 3 AFC North Teams in the playoffs. As well as the defense rounded out in the back end of the season, who knows what coulda been?

    1

  17. The Ravens front office and John Harbaugh have been vindicated yet again. It was late January 2014, the last head coaching vacancy in the NFL had been filled with Detroit's poaching of Jim Caldwell (and Teryl Austin) from us. No one had the foresight (not even his bestie, John Elway) to think that perhaps the 2-14 record in Houston wasn't on Gary Kubiak and his crew. Harbaugh gave him respect, came to an understanding, hired him, had one of the most successful seasons of Ravens offense in our history, and re-established his reputation. Kubiak is a good man, and history is witness that the owner and GM in Houston scapegoated him and his crew. Now he's on his way to a Super Bowl and we're proud to have been part of it.

    We're even prouder that Bisciotti, Ozzie, and Harbaugh have created a place that coaches and players can come to redeem themselves.

    2