Bruce_Almty

Members
  • Content count

    2,827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Bruce_Almty


  1. 1 hour ago, ellicottraven said:

    Let me take my best shot at this:

    QB: Flacco, Mallet

    RB/FB: Forsett, Dixon, Allen, Juice

    WR: Smith Sr., Perriman, Wallace, Aiken, Moore, (one of Chris Mathews, Marlon Brown, Darren Waller or Daniel Brown) and Reynolds (also 3rd QB)

    TE: Watson, Williams, Gillmore

    OL: Monroe, Stanley, Wagner, Yanda, Jensen,Urschel, Zuttah and Lewis,

    DL: Williams, Jernigan, Davis, Kaufusi, Guy, Urban and Henry 

    OLB: Suggs, Dumervil, Correa, Z. Smith, Judon and Ochi

    ILB: Mosely, Orr, Mclellan or Brown, FA

    CB: Smith, Wright, Young, Davis, Canady or Arrington or FA

    S: Weddle, Webb, Levine, Brooks, Elam/Kendrick Lewis

    ST: Tucker, Koch, Cox

       1

    For this time of year ... I think you nailed it. Good call on Reynolds as our 3rd QB.

    1

  2. On 5/5/2016 at 0:09 AM, atomicfront said:

    I think we have a very easy schedule.  That being said the team is going to be pretty bad.  The offensive line we subtracted Osemele and added Stanley.  I would say that is a negative.   We lost two starting linebackers who haven't been replaced. Flacco is coming off an injury.  Our other best players Yanda, Suggs, Smith, and Dumervil are old and getting older.  

    4-12. 

     

    Vegas (Bovada) projects the Ravens to be an 8-8 team so I would not bet the ranch on 4-12.

    0

  3. As I recall, the Ravens have been having a string of road game loses and have been equally unimposing at home. So many recovering ACL and other serious injuries also does not bode well for a highly successful season. I expect an improvement over last season but Cincinnati and Pittsburgh are still the teams to beat. The nine games after the bye feel like 3 & 6 at the moment. Vegas lists them as basically an 8-8 team; anything more seems like a purple kool aid pick.

    -4

  4. I don't know why everyone here thinks SSSr is a lock. He's 37, he retired, was injured, un-retired and is rehabbing. People seem to think he'll perform as if he was 34 again. I for one am not buying it. I love his fiery spirit and I hope he fully recovers, but Ozzie needs to have a heart-2-heart with him. He's taking a roster spot from a young'in.

    0

  5. I am also absolutely hating our mocks with Stanley and Elliot. We are essentially in win now mode with the hopes of retaining valuable players for the future. Stanley won't immediately start and I just don't see him being worth the 6th pick. Just look at many of the recent top tackles that were hyped up and have failed to look like top 5-10 picks. Jake Matthews, Robinson, Joeckel, Fisher, etc. None of those guys look like Joe Thomas or Tyron Smith lol It just shows that even though they are going at early slots, doesn't mean they are worth it. Elliot will be a stud at the pro level and while I'll be pretty upset that we didn't address our other major holes, I still see him making a big splash in our offense. He is a legit top 10 talent, but I don't see him as being quite on the level of Gurley though. Ultimate outcome of our first pick is we get a game changer on defense that will be a huge contributor for +10 years, such as a Ramsey, Bosa, Buckner, Jack, or even Hargreaves, maybe if all the planets align we could get the true elite LT in Tunsil, but just a month away.

    We all knew beating the Steelers at the end of the season was gonna cost us a game-changer pick.

    0

  6.   53 minutes ago, VermontRaven said:

    Regarding the replay, I think the NFL should do what Tennis does for their challenges. If the original call was wrong, that doesn't count against your challenges. A team should not be punished for an official's incorrect call.

    I had a very similar idea the other day: each team should be given two unsuccessful challenges per game - meaning each team could go on challenging any challengeable ruling until their second challenge that doesn't result in the reversal of the original ruling. If it's 10 good challenges before the second unsuccessful one, it's 10. If it's zero, it's zero.

    Totally agree, makes no sense to penalize a team that challenges an officials erroneous call.

    0