I know why you said to cut Wallace is strictly a financial reason - but you would really cut the second leading TD receiver on the team. Wallace had over 1000 yards and 4 TD's. Who do you replace him with? You cut him and roster goes to Perriman and Aiken - how competitive do you expect to be with just them? There is no way to cut Wallace without severely decimating the offense more than it currently is. Feel like his second year with Flacco will be even more productive. If anything I foresee his contract getting extended for a year and reducing his cap hit for 2017.
People need to recall and understand that in 2015 we had $20 Million in dead cap money for players who were either out of the NFL (Rice $9.5 mill to play xbox) or playing for another team (Ngata $7.5 mill to Lions) (Jones $2.6 mill to Chargers). That's $20 million in 2015 that I have not seen a single person on here other than myself comment on. Who did we miss out on in FA because this money was dead?
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens/joe-flacco-4000/
Flacco's contract....was extremely TEAM friendly his first 3 years AFTER WINNING A SUPERBOWL!!!!
Original Contract
Base Signing Bonus Option Bonus Cap Hit
2013
$1,000,000
$5,800,000
-
$6,800,000
2014
$6,000,000
$5,800,000
$3,000,000
$14,800,000
2015
$4,000,000
$5,800,000
$4,750,000
$14,550,000
2016
$18,000,000
$5,800,000
$4,750,000
$28,550,000
2017
$20,600,000
$5,800,000
$4,750,000
$31,150,000
2018
$20,000,000
-
$4,750,000
$24,750,000
Restructured Contract
2016
$4,000,000
$13,800,000
$4,750,000
$22,550,000
2017
$6,000,000
$13,800,000
$4,750,000
$24,550,000
2018
$12,000,000
$8,000,000
$4,750,000
$24,750,000
2019
$18,500,000
$8,000,000
$26,500,000
2020
$20,250,000
$8,000,000
$28,250,000
His restructured contract reduced his cap hit in 2016 by $6 Million and by $7 Million in 2017 WHICH HE DID NOT HAVE TO DO BUT HE DID BECAUSE HE WAS TRYING TO HELP THE TEAM!!!!
IDK.... "BC he was trying to help the team"? If Joe was trying to help the team ... you don't threaten the hold out and play the games that he and Mr. Litna played on his contract year. They knew that they broke the bank on that contract bc they had us stuck. Hands tied... They knew from day 1 that down the road this contract would need to be re-negotiated... and Joe even said that. But they also knew that if you get the giant numbers up front.... that would mean more guaranteed money down the road... via signing bonuses, etc. So did they do it to help the team? If feel like there was a lot more self-preservation in that decision process then charity! In fact I think in a lot of ways he handicapped the team...and made it impossible now with all of the dead money to trade of move him. I get it... every player wants to get as much as they can... but when they do... and they re-structure to get more up front... and more guaranteed.... I don't see that as them being charitable and trying to help their team? But that's just me!