Sizzlebshu

Antonio brown took him to school and he had safety help over the top the rest of the season So add that to the above yea but then you have to give butler and mccourty credit not just butler

Fools gold. Pats schedule was full of 2nd and 3rd string qbs. Got exposed against better offenses. Better players

I prefer the Prophet formerly know as Sizz

Gilmore was probably the only pick i liked out of the last couple. Graham having patellar surgery, durability issues, and not being scheme versatile are downsides for me. i like jpp but there are obv questions and better players imo Better players in general than jones

Idt there is a more divisive qb than dalton rn. Some eval think he can be a franchise qb, others think that he is holding the bengals back im in the latter camp with a caveat, you can mask a qbs deficiencies with scheme and personnel and be a contender. Dalton is a game manager that falls into that category and is good value

Pick is in. Had him higher than several players who went before him.

Rodney McLeod

.... Im dying squidward. Just comical

Get a ton of YAC, hands improved (only 3 drops), speed demon to compliment Dez. Having a season where you improve as a wideout after your franchise QB goes down is tough, but Hilton proved he was more than just a product of Luck.

It's in. I ctrl f'd every possible iteration of this guy's name so I'm gonna be kind of ticked if he's gone (again). I think I selected the perfect compliment to Dez Bryant.

T.Y. Hilton

I know who you are talking about. Same

Well my pick got a ton of hate lol

Already fixed.

Well screw ctrl F then

Navorrow Bowman

See ya in 10 hrs. Gotta go get that horrid rap out of my head. No but really there are like 4 players here that I want and I'm trying to decide.

It does make a difference because if your offense doesnt revolve that player, you aren't getting what you're paying for. You can give Todd Gurley/OtherAmazingRBHere 15 carries a game and he'd likely be just as effective on a per carry basis, but it'd be stupid to take him #1 overall if this was your plan. Ideally, you give that guy as many as he can handle. Scheme fit matters to teams when they draft them, and it also matters in general. Bell can fit in any scheme, but taking Bell this early should dictate that you need to adapt your scheme to Bell to maximize returns, which dictates your needs going forward. That's why I don't feel like any RB is good value when you can get young cornerstone pieces and manufacture the production at the RB position otherwise via scheme.

I'm not saying Bell doesn't have talent, but the runningback in a Todd Hayley offense sees a ton of usage both in the run and passing game. They essentially never come off the field. It's absurd to say that doesn't play a role in his production.

I dont trust Bell to stay healthy. Also given how d-will performed in the interim, I'm more inclined to think the massive production is at least in part schme related based on the back's role in the offense.

Trufant doesn't get as much love as other corners etc... because the defense he plays on is so terrible, but that has absolutely nothing to do with his play.

The Packers took Spriggs because even they don't like him at LT

Desmond Trufant

Keep pushing good players down to me guys

Also was one of the leaders in targeys avging like an absurd 15 a game