jboy19

Members
  • Content count

    923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jboy19

  1. I'd be extremely jealous haha Edit: Unless Myles Jack's knee is as bad as teams seem to think it is.
  2. Browns: Andrew Billings, DL, Baylor Titans: Noah Spence, OLB/DE, Eastern Kentucky Cowboys: Kevin Dodd, DE, Clemson Chargers: T.J. Green, FS/CB, Clemson Ravens: Mackensie Alexander, CB, Clemson Chiefs: Reggie Ragland, LB, Alabama Jags: Myles Jack, LB, UCLA
  3. I think 4 is a possibility, but with the large group of receivers we have I think 3 is more likely. My guess is that Taliaferro is probably the favorite to win that 3rd spot. Never know if they'll add a rookie to the mix though, and if it's a guy with ST/return ability, then I could see them keeping 4.
  4. Gotta think Taliaferro, West, and Richardson are all fighting for one spot. I think Forsett and Allen are locks while Taliaferro, West, and Richardson all play really similarly.
  5. My worst draft nightmares would be Stanley (See him as a Joeckel-type), Ragland (Think he is a two-down player), and Elliott (Not at 6 at least) or Henry (Don't see him being successful in the NFL). I like Buckner, but I think taking him at 6 is not ideal.
  6. Ravens never get a good grade in Free Agency. And I think that is a good thing.
  7. I feel like if Bosa was using party drugs it would be really easy to figure out. These teams go deep into players' pasts with investigators and stuff. It'll be interesting to see what happens with him.
  8. It seems like there's always someone who steps up on the OL when a player leaves and it works out most of the time (KO, Wagner) but not all the time (Gradkowski).
  9. I think the value matters. I wouldn't mind giving it up for a guy like Mike Neal to improve the pass rush. I'd target Louis Vasquez if we wanted a guard though- Cap Casualty and decent player last year.
  10. I think Urschel would be a fine LG. Also, the FO seemed to value Leon Brown at the guard position over Robert Myers, who got drafted and was easily let go. If you throw in a 3rd/4th round pick you have a decent enough competition to find someone likely serviceable.
  11. If we sign another UFA as opposed to a Cap Casualty we'll lose what is probably going to be a 3rd Round Comp pick for KO.
  12. Not that I am complaining or anything but I am kinda curious why the Ravens went after Mike Wallace when they could have gotten Chris Givens for less money and gotten a player with some experience in the system. I think that they are somewhat similar players.
  13. So my best guess is that the opening roster carries 3 Tight Ends. 53 Man: Williams (lock), Watson (lock), and Waller (valuable ST performer). SUS: Boyle (10 games) PUP: Gillmore (6-10 games) CUT: Ford, Reuland, Spears, Pitta.
  14. I'm surprised we never heard any injury concerns about KO during the whole FA process. Big fan of KO and wish him success in OAK, but he hasn't played a full season since he was a rookie and even when he played 14 games in 2014 he had those lingering back issues that seemed to affect his play.
  15. I guess to defend what I said earlier. I wasn't implying that the Chargers cut Donald Butler because they plan on taking Myles Jack (No sane GM would do that) but you have to think that with that player gone, the Chargers may value the LB position (in FA and/or the draft) higher than they would had they not cut Donald Butler.
  16. Have to think the Chargers releasing Donald Butler makes Jack an option for them.
  17. But would we really draft a player that would either put Mosley on the bench for passing downs or replace the existing slot players (Webb, Elam, Brooks) on the field in those situation.
  18. I don't think it's a top priority to replace Canty or Smith. There's committees at both those spots (DE- Urban, Guy, KLM) (ILB- Orr, Brown, McClellan) that have shown some good stuff on tape.
  19. Yeah I wouldn't want to get Arian Foster. He's had health and effectiveness issues recently.
  20. Jermon Bushrod and William Beatty have both been cut, neither seems to be a remarkable option, but they wouldn't lose a Comp. Pick. Other than that Russell Okung (Too Much money) and Donald Penn (old) are options that would count against comp picks.
  21. I think most worst case scenarios would involve Cleveland taking (or trading down for someone to take) a non-QB, which seems unlikely. I think this draft is deep, but there aren't going to be any can't miss prospects. At this point, I would consider the top guys to be Ramsey and Tunsil and I am assuming that neither of these guys is going to be there at 6. I think Tunsil is going to an option for TEN, SD or JAX while Ramsey is an option for TEN, CLE, SD, DAL or JAX. I'm putting Tunsil and Ramsey at 1/2 because they fit every scheme and are extremely unlikely to fall. So far the draft looks like this: TEN- Laremy Tunsil CLE- Jalen Ramsey SD on the clock I would put the next tier for Buckner, Myles Jack, Ronnie Stanley and Joey Bosa. SD is likely going to be considering Buckner, Stanley and Jack. So I'm going under 3 separate situations. Scenario 1: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Buckner; Scenario 2: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Stanley; Scenario 3: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Jack; DAL on the clock I think DAL would probably have Ramsey. Jack and Bosa high and in that order. Scenario 1: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Buckner; DAL- Jack Scenario 2: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Stanley; DAL- Jack Scenario 3: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Jack; DAL- Bosa JAX on the clock JAX priority order probably mirrors so in Scenario 1 and 2, they take Bosa. This leaves JAX at the short end of the stick with Buckner and Stanley probably not high on their list (JAX has invested a decent amount of money/draft picks at OT (Joeckel and Parnell) and interior DL (Marks, Odrick, and Miller). I would see JAX desperately trying to trade out here for someone going for Buckner or Stanley- splitting possibilities again. Leaving BAL in 4 worst case scenarios. 1: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Buckner; DAL- Jack; JAX- Bosa 2: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Stanley; DAL- Jack; JAX- Bosa 3: TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Jack; DAL- Bosa; ???- Stanley 4. TEN- Tunsil; CLE- Ramsey; SD- Jack; DAL- Bosa; ???- Buckner So in this case the Ravens most likely options are: (1) Taking Stanley, (2) Trading Down, (3) Taking Buckner. Trading down in this scenario would not be likely because SF sitting behind the Ravens is not likely to draft a OT or a DE/DT. So this depends on if KO resigns or not. If he does then Ravens likely take Buckner and if he doesn't then the Ravens likely take Stanley.
  22. Looks like Darian Thompson needs to improve his 40 at his pro day or else he'll be in rounds 3-4.
  23. He played his role well. He stopped the run and held the edge. Would have been nice to have him get 10 or so sacks a season, but thats just not his game.
  24. Looks like Hue Jackson's comments about needing a QB with large hands may stop them from taking Goff and his tiny hands with the second pick. Looks like it's either going to be Wentz, Lynch or a non-QB at 2. This is a bummer because the Browns are a wild-card and could snag pretty much any of the top prospects (Tunsil, Bosa, Ramsey, Jack, Buckner). It's hard to tell what they could be doing with their new FO. I think they would try to trade down, but I don't think anybody is looking to go up in this draft for anyone this year.