jboy19

Members
  • Content count

    923
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About jboy19

  • Rank
    Veteran
  • Birthday 05/10/1992

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Pittsburgh, PA

Recent Profile Visitors

2,911 profile views
  1. I'd probably pick Bowser. I think both are in the same vein of athletes who need to be refined. Bowser imo appears closer (which makes sense since Watt only played defense 1 year). I think Bowser can also do more than Watt off the LOS as well.
  2. As much as it was kinda a bummer not to get away with a WR or 2, I didn't really think there were any receivers we could have taken that wouldn't have been pretty bad reaches. I'm glad that they stayed disciplined and stuck to the board. I mainly came in with players I didn't like that I didn't want the Ravens to draft, and the Ravens didn't draft any of them, so I'm generally pretty happy. I'd give it a B+ I think Cleveland had a pretty decent haul- not phenomenal, but decent. Garrett is going to be a beast (obviously), but I'm not sure that the developmental guys (Peppers, Njoku, Kizer) were good picks bc Idk if Hue gets to be there long enough to get them ready. Got some decent role players (Ogunjobi, Wilson) in the middle rounds. Generally a pretty future-focused draft. I'd give it a A- I'm not big on Cincy's draft. I think Ross was a huge reach at 9 and the questions about his availability are pretty well-founded. Mixon is solid, but Cincy has no OL who are worth anything. Pretty jealous they snuck off with Dielman though. I'd give it a C Pittsburgh was okay. Watt isn't someone to bet against, but his tape wasn't that special. JJSS is pretty polarizing, I think he'll be decent in a rotation, probably not a game-changer though. Sutton probably stuck in the slot competing with Golson. Conner was a reach. I'd give it a B.
  3. Definitely needed some more ST players. People don't realize the Ravens lost a lot of their best ST players- Juice, Huff and Elam (believe it or not) were two of the best ST players on the roster last year and they're gone. Clark has good field vision/tackling ability and seems like a perfect ST coverage guy. With Levine, Waller, Onwuasor, McClellan, Canady and now Clark- there's a solid group of ST players on the roster to aid with the last season's departures.
  4. He's quick enough to stay outside I think. I wouldn't rule him out of getting some time Year 1. He's definitely raw, but there's really interesting traits.
  5. A little consistency goes a long way. Flacco coming back at full strength will help. Perriman getting a full offseason will help. If Moore develops and Camp stays healthy the receiving corps will be fine. Im somewhat concerned about the OL, but Boyle will do a fine job in Juice's role- especially in the passing game.
  6. I actually think the offense will be better this year than last year.
  7. So Hyyyyyyypeeee I love it.
  8. Now I can relax lol
  9. I'm not really sure that the pick was the best value, but it's hard to find press corners and since they're so important to Pees defense, I get why they would want to reach on one a little bit. He's a super young guy though and he won't have to start right away, so the situation is pretty ideal for him.
  10. I definitely agree about needing to get a couple OL pieces- I'm really big on Lamp, Elflein, Moton, Dawkins and Bisnowaty. Any 2 of those would be phenomenal to me.
  11. My quick list of don't wants- of guys I've seen going in Round 2-3, would mainly be Cam Robinson, Tanoh Kpassagnon, Daeshon Hall, Raekwon McMillan, Jarron Jones and Vince Biegel.
  12. I expect Lamp and Cam to be 33 and 34
  13. Thats an okay pick. Not phenomenal. But okay.
  14. Cincy getting Ross is pretty ideal for us.
  15. Somewhat related question: anyone know the best way to watch the draft? I've always just stuck to ESPN, but always wondered if theres better options out there.