BmoreBird, I really like your stuff. I think you are one of the best posters I've seen on here. I've never, ever read anything you've read about defensive cover schemes and disagreed. Or on anything else, really. You talk down a lot of loonies in a very authoritative way, and far beyond anything I could ever do. However, I had the pleasure of living in the metro Denver area during the McDaniels tenure. IN GENERAL, I agree with you on coaches. You'll rarely find me as passionate about a potential hire as I am with this one. But not with this guy. I got an unfortunate amount of Denver local media during that time, and if I were to liken him to a world leader, it wouldn't be a mediocre-to-below average US president. It would be Kim Jong-un. The thing blew up in his face, and while he kept getting the chance to show people even ONE reason why he was the victim of poor circumstances or had potential to right the ship a bit if given more time and experience, he would consistently double down and make it so, so, SO much worse than it had to be. The X's and O's can remain a debate, but it was his leadership style and failures, not so much as a coach but usually as a human being, that just make me think that he won't be the guy you want at age 36, 46, 56, or 66. If he was unquestionably the reason for the success in New England, I'd see it differently. However, I think there's just as much evidence that he's a system guy as there is that he genuinely possesses rare wisdom, and given his leadership style and some examples of horrific behavior from guys who are universally respected around the league, I don't see what the pro-McDaniels camp is seeing.
I'm not saying I'm right. I could be completely wrong and you might be right. I'm just saying that I'm reacting the same way you might if you went to Los Angeles and they were talking about hiring Cam Cameron to resurrect their offense. I think I understand why no one wanted to give this guy another shot at it, and why New England feels the need to politic for his hiring in public.