Willbacker

Members
  • Content count

    1,810
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Willbacker

  1. Just now reading bout the Jernigan stuff here but are you saying you want to trade our original pick plus Jernigan to move up a couple spots? I do have to say Ozzie like those deals lol but I'd be against that considering he could have a heck of a year and we could gain a good comp. I believe if Jernigan is traded tho it'd be a player for player move.
  2. Joe played a lot better in the 2nd half of the year but when you making the 2nd highest money in the league you gotta put a lot more on his shoulders. The money dictates that. Joe is going to be healthy next year plus he said he's gonna hold a camp with his receivers( Which I'm holding him to) and let the cards fall where they may. Gotta solidify this offensive line tho but right now cutting Joe will cost us 47 mil against the cap so you know straight up ITS NOT HAPPENING. So deal. Cry,cry cry all everybody wants but Joe is the QB for the next 2 yrs and he owns what he does. Period!! We made that bed.
  3. Wow!! Great story.
  4. Pretty crazy how they usually stick A DB back there to make the sure handed catches lol.
  5. Not sure. Never heard anything negative.
  6. I know this is a trade down scenario thread and what I like is this is a draft deep on defense but seriously lacking on offense especially at the OT spot and I'm thinking a guy like Garrett Bolles could lock down our RT position for the next 5 yrs and he.aint getting past Denv imo and getting an interior guy in the 5th or 6th like Guillermo could help solidify the Ol.. Not really interested in a tradeback cuz it seems like we miss out.
  7. I like the backwards and forwards on that. Just saying ....
  8. You know its late on Sat night let me break out my facebook
  9. I'td be great to get Webb to back up the safety position but usually backups especially on D gotta perform on sp teams. Thats a big hangup.
  10. This would be a fair deal since its not a given the Ravens would be able to keep him but I don't think the Eagles would go for it I'm all for it tho.
  11. You can't go by a guy's pick total only and what has Claiborne done to suggest he's a playmaker. A steady corner and a good 3rd down option at RB are wasted money? Lol. Plus both contracts are easy to get out of And then what kills me is you're willing to throw 6 mil at King Dunlap.
  12. I'm sure Cleveland would be highly interested in trading with Baltimore. Lets use our 6th on a receiver instead.
  13. A little bit of an overstatement??
  14. Ahhhh Mt Airy is Ravens country anyways. Welcome aboard. Gotta hate the Skins man. They didn't want us to have a football team.
  15. Actually whoever signs those guys we get their picks. They're not comps.
  16. Thanks for the input. Really helped me understand a lot better. The cancelling process I'm gonna have to assume thats on a team by team basis whereas each individual player actually effects 2 teams (ex Jefferson- Ravens/Cards) and then it shakes out to whatever the top 32 turns out for all teams combined according to players gained and lost. Man I tell ya what a complicated process. I bolded the one section cuz I remember us not getting a comp for Tyrod where I thought we would cuz of the playing time so imo his low contract was weighed way over his playing time. Oh well. @rossihunter2 Thanks for the replies. I think we both in the same boat trying to figger this process out lol.
  17. Okay lets say Guy is the only other FA we lose that ends up in the top 32 and we don't sign any other UFAs and it ends up Wagner is worth a 3rd,Juice a 5th and Guy a 6th and Jefferson ends up as a 4th would it end up with us getting a 3rd and 6th with Jefferson and Juice cancelling? To me this is what I'm getting from your answer and it makes sense and if Wagner is a 4th then we'd get the 5th and 6th I believe. Also if you happen to know is contracts the main determination in comp picks and if it is is it the total money or the money per year? Thanks.
  18. Its funny how the NFL has never come out ans said "Alright this is how it works" Last year for instance we lost Schaub,Upshaw and Osemele and gained Weddle and Watson which as we all know in the end netted us a 3rd for Osemele. As of now we've lost Ducasse,Wagener and Juice and have netted Woodhead and Jefferson probally leaving us with Wagner as a 3rd or 4th comp. I know a lot is dependent on contracts but here confusion sets in with me at so to keep it simple lets also say we lose Guy as our only other FA lost and don't sign another UFA. Lets also just say Guy gets a 2 yr 5 mil deal. Okay so would Jefferson cancel Guy(lower contract) or Juice. Regardless we would be 4 lost to 2 gained therefore do we get a 4(Wagner) and a 5(Juice) or a 4(Wagner) and a 6(Guy). What needs to be really known is do they match up contracts or take your highest 2 to give you comps. Now just to get back to 2016 for a minute. We know Osemele blew away everybody elses contract but both Weddle's and Watson's contracts were well above Upshaw and Schaub's but yet these were the ones cancelled.
  19. Great post man. Had some great years here.
  20. That's a good under the radar signing.
  21. Bet you that area code starts off 555 lol
  22. Its just that I think these facts are overlooked sometimes. Theres life and family involved in decisions
  23. Does it cost a lot of money or something to keep a message board? Lot of people don't use social media. Don't understand why anybody wants their lifestory out in public. Lots of people here that I respect their opinion. Now I might never hear from them again.
  24. Maybe Wagner just wanted to go back home. Notice how quick he signed.