wizard1

Members
  • Content count

    1,130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wizard1


  1. Man you guys are something else. All last year I was talking about how bad of an OC Marc Trestman was and the whole time you guys were supporting him. Most of you are the same guys that supported Ray Rice. Now you are all jumping on the Marty Morningweh bandwagon. How quickly you forget. Morningweh was voted the worst coach in NFL history in many circles. He had an abysmal record with the Detroit Lions. This is another bad decision that will be placed directly at the door of John Harbaugh. Har-Ball is the real reason for the dysfunction on this team. Everything begins and ends with the HC. Mark my words once again John Harbaughs' days as the head coach in Baltimore are numbered. If he finishes the season I will be surprised.

    -6

  2. 1 minute ago, Red723 said:

    Harbs deserves to be fired, but the % chance of finding a better one on the market is slim.  One could say belichek is the greatest coach in the past decade and a half so we could choose one of his proteges, but we did that with harbs.  We got 1 sb out of harbs so he wasn't a complete bust.  He gave us what like 7 good seasons?  Where will we find someone better?  Now, trestman definitely needs to go asap.

    Josh McDaniels is the obvious choice ! As new HC !

    0

  3. 5 hours ago, MTRavensFan said:

    Well for the P*triots it was back in 2000, but they play in a creampuff division. Still, give them their due.

    The Broncos went 4-12 in 2010, prompting a petition signed by almost 18,000 fans calling for the firing of Josh McDaniels, who you recently suggested we bring in, and the birth of the website  JoshMcDanielsSucks (too much profanity there to give you a link, try Google). Prior to that they were 8-8 in 2008 and 2009, and 7-9 in 2007.

    Seahawks went 5-11 in 2009, and 4-12 in 2008.

    Chiefs went 2-14 in 2012, after going 4-12 in both 2007 and 2009.

    Packers 4-12 in 2005, and 6-10 in 2008. So really, not that long ago. Prior to last year, for the Ravens in was 2007. So if "THIS IS WHAT WE SHOULD LOOK LIKE", this is what we DO look like.

    Guess who the winner is? Steelers, of course - you have to go all the way back to 1988 to find a 5-11 season. And guess what? WE PLAY IN THEIR DIVISION! and consistently beat them. So all your angry griping is just that - angry griping with NO basis in fact. Wikipedia is a beautiful thing, you might want to give it a try next time, instead of subjecting the rest of us to your rants.

    You mad bruh?

    0

  4. 5 hours ago, K-Dog said:

    The two are not mutually exclusive.  You somehow think they are.  I guess that is what being so negative all the time will do to your outlook on pretty much everything. 

    Reality or not you are very negative. 

    Furthermore I am hardly oblivious, I see just fine.  Either way, I feel better living in a more positive and hopefull light than I would having a reality that is all doom and gloom.  It must be draining really.

    Are you kidding? It takes way more time and energy to keep your balloon filled with air. On the other hand I turned my balloon into a slingshot which I use to jettison windbags that like to huff and puff.

    While I love my Ravens, trust me I bleed purple , I'm sickened by the way our team has turned into a third world country.  There is very little meat and potatoes to our team. I look at the Patriots, the Packers, and the Broncos of the league and they consistently put together competitive teams with proven results. When was the last time either of those teams had a 5-11 season? Not to mention the Seahawks, Steelers and Chiefs.. All of these teams are the elite teams. I hate not being an elite team and if we are not dominating then we are being dominated. That's just unacceptable!!

    0

  5. 12 hours ago, OUravensfan said:

    What does the Wizard see this week for Flacco and Perriman?

    Honestly I am totally unimpressed with Perriman. In fact at this point he is a complete wash and has only proven he was definitely not a #1 pick. As for Flacco I anticipate the usual game from Joe. Nothing spectacular and constantly on his horse because we basically have one of  the worst O-Line's in football.

    I also don't understand all the hoopla about Kenneth Dixon. He is nothing special. It doesn't matter what our RB situation is. Running back by committee never works . What about Trent Richardson? I am still lmao about that whole fiasco. What about the Forsette farce. Sign him, cut him, resign him, cut him again. It's embarrassing.

    We don't match up well against the Redskins. They have superior personnel. However we got Trestman who actually looks more like a bad grandpa type character. Sort of reminds of Joe Paterno. Be happy I'm not in charge because there would be a gaggle of guys looking for new jobs.

    -3

  6. No matter how you slice and dice it we have a team full of underachievers and that boils down to poor drafting, lackluster game plans, and no real identity on offense. We are mired in the Newsome/Harbaugh plugging holes philosophy and while they have been excellent at the helm in the past we are now and have been for some time a rudderless ship. Thankfully the hurricane will pass us by but a different kind of storm is gathering here in Baltimore and it's time to get some guys outta there. Let's think about bringing in Josh McDaniels.

    -13

  7. 38 minutes ago, codizzle said:

    Oh stats. My bad. There's a lot more to defense than YPG.

    There's nothing that makes me believe Ravens have number one defense currently in the league. 

    Much improved and the strongest part of the team? Definitely 

    We have the #1 ranked defensively statistically like it or not. However you are right we definitely don't look like it. More because we've played some bad teams. Bottom line is we don't match up well against the skins. They simply have more talented personnel.

    -2

  8. Ok Here's the skinny. I don't need the injury report to predict this game. We have the # 1 defense in the league and the Redskins have the # 7 offense but what does that mean exactly? It means we can't count on the defense to win games for us. Therefore since we have a below average offense we can't depend on the offense to win games for us either. We have 84 points after 4 games the Redskins have 99. That means something.. Skins are 3 points a game better. These are both 3-2 teams. Skins 23-20. I'm a Wizard--I see things!

    -7

  9. On 10/3/2016 at 11:19 PM, usmccharles said:

    Right now I don't believe we are that good of a team.   However,  finding ways to win,  even sloppy shows this team has some grit.   But I don't believe we will be able to hang with NE,  steelers,  maybe the Bengals..

    Wow I'm surprised to read this post because we finally agree on something. The responsibility for this madness begins at the top. Average talent, draft busts and lack of execution are because of poor leadership. The formula that has worked in the past obviously doesn't work now. When a house is shabbily  constructed , tear it down and rebuild.

    -9

  10. Just now, Sami84 said:

    one more thing wizard1

     

    check the atlanta falcons record and who THEY played to get to 2-1

     

    check out their D.

    what do you think now?

     

    Tampa,Oakland,Saints...

     

    on a scale of 1-10 how impressive are those D's?

    falcons still beat them..

     

    Oh I'm not saying one bad thing about our defense. It's has played lights out and getting Eric Weddle is a huge boost for this team. I love our D so far.

    1