jazz1988

3 minutes ago, rafahash said:

Does that mean we're playing zone coverage next year?

The Ravens run variety of coverages but Dean Pees does love zone coverage.

2 minutes ago, ravensdfan said:

Well goodnight all.

We have plenty of "solid" players. What we needed were playmakers. Humphrey might be a decent pick, but I don't see a playmaker there. Our offense is our biggest area of need and we've done nothing for it in FA and nothing for it now either. Not seeing any offensive talent that can be called playmakers either.

Guess it will be the same old, same old.

Disappointing.

There's still the second and third round .I expect some playmakers to still be around on offense and defense in the second round and third but good night.

Just now, Sami84 said:

I dont understand why we didnt trade back. He probably would have been available at 24 or even 28

Got to have a trade partner to trade back with and it's no telling that  he would have been there at 24th pick or 28th pick.The Titans may have took him instead or maybe even The Redskins. 

I think The Buccs get O.J Howard

4 minutes ago, DomMcRaven said:

Well I hope he can play outside. 

Yes he definitely can do that for sure.

Humphrey got all the tools to be great corner but  he wasn't high on my board.

Marlon Humphrey is the guy .

If I'm The Ravens  I would trade down if possible.

Just now, MadStorkSociety said:

Maybe someone will trade up with us to get Howard

I  can see The Buccs or The Broncos doing that.

Colts could take Hooker. They need safety help bad but they also need offensive line help bad as well which has been  a problem for them  about 3 years or so for them.

Just now, arnie_uk said:

He'll be lucky if he goes in the first 3 rounds

I seen reports that The Bengals are seriously considering him if he falls to them in second round.

Noooooooooooooooooooo they took Barnett.

Could be Joe Mixon for The Eagles as well.

The Eagles could go Dalvin Cook or Derek Barnett. 

Just now, Cville-Raven said:

Weird you go Reddick over Foster

Foster off the field concerns and recently failing his drug test has scare teams away atleast some of them.

I forgot all about Reddick and it makes sense for The Cardinals.

I think The Cardinals take Hooker or Howard.

1 minute ago, rmw10 said:

I think Watson is a great fit in Houston.  Great defense to carry him and a solid array of weapons around him.  We know he can turn it on when the lights are bright.

True . I honestly thought he was best quarterback in this draft .

2 minutes ago, ellicottraven said:

With Allen dropping it may make sense to give up one of the 3rd and go up and get him. He's going to be dominant for us up the middle. I can't even imagine how tough he'll make it for opposing O-lines.

But if his shoulder issues is really a problem  which is causing him to drop them why trade up for him ? He's top 5 talent who may be falling due to medical concerns so not sure if The Ravens should trade up for a guy that may just fall to them regardless.

Looks like The Texans are getting their quarterback now.

I think The Saints take Hooker or Barnett.

If there's ever a guy that knows how to develop quarterback it's Andy Reid so Patrick Maholmes( I think I spelled his last name wrong) should be in good hands

Wow t

3 minutes ago, rmw10 said:

And what if Hooker turns into the guy your screen name is based off of?

Do you thinks it's realistic  to think Hooker could play at that level right away and beat out Webb, Weddle, and Jefferson for playing time? 

I figured they would take John Ross

4 minutes ago, arnie_uk said:

What planet do you live on. Everyone in the world knew they were picking him

I never question the pick just thought it was a interesting pick especially in The Panther offense with Cam Newton and their triple option.