stm85

Members
  • Content count

    2,663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by stm85


  1. You're not top 5 bc of Brock, but I consider you a competitor for the big money.

    look at the cowboys... No cap space. As a result, they SUCK. The Chargers also massively downgraded at several positions....

    You ask me, my top 5 in no particular order

    1. Seattle

    2. Myself

    3. Eagles

    4. Denver

    5. Packers

    Followed by the Browns(nice improvement), Niners, Jacksonville(who's team is the most improved), Raiders(older, but still effective for another season or two), Carolina, Saints(even though they downgraded).

    After around that there's the drop off.

     

    I'll take #3. I do think Seattle is the team to beat, no doubt. I think your Bengals did massively upgrade at QB but I'm still not sure that Romo can win a title; however he is worlds better than Dalton. I doubt I'd rank you second but top 5 seems right. My team is strong across the board and can win with offense or defense, which is something the Eagles didn't have last year. I think my ranking is about right. Denver made some good moves to a high caliber squad and should remain very dangerous. They might be my #2 team. Packers have also made some nice moves to supplement a strong roster. 

    0

  2. You had to, given the situation. You were dealt a poor hand. It's one of the best. But I've improved mine as well.

     

    Yea yours came to mind as the one that might be better. Then again, you had an elite group to being with. The city of Philadelphia should give me an award for turning Fletcher, Cary, Boykin, Chung, and Allen into Vontae, Shields, Boykin, Weddle, and Nelson.

    0

  3. Again, that slights me which isn't fair either as I've already explained I would cut conte and then I had no one left to sign so I would dedicate all funds to shields... Which is why there should be some sort of compromise as suggested in my previous post.

     

    Curious, how much would Conte being cut and nobody else leave you. This isn't your fault at all but I feel like I am getting a raw deal here.

    0

  4. I definitely understand that. It's a very unfortunate situation. But every GM prior to this scenario was allowed to cut bids in order to up the ante. He reserves that right as well. If we don't allow him to bid because of a mistake made by the upstairs, then it would be unfair to him as well.

     

    I'd feel differently if he had the space to make the bid, but this gives him a ridiculously unfair advantage and I don't think any bid above 9 should count.

    0

  5. Miami Hurricane and stm85 will have to bid for Shields. It's unfortunate for the latter, as his bid was posted. But you didn't receive a bid because the former was attempting to figure out what was going on, as there was obviously a mistake made.

     

    Seeing as he'd have to make cuts to even match my bid, I don't see how its fair for him to be able to make cuts and then bid with the knowledge of my bid.

    0