Definitely have to disagree with that. Pees isn't as aggressive with the blitzing as a Rex Ryan or Chuck Pagano but he is a top 10 DC in the league. Very intelligent, get's the most out of his players, consistently game plans well for opposing offenses. I thought he did a phenomenal job game planning especially for Pitt and Cheatriots in the playoffs last year. You can't blame Pees for our absolutely depleted secondary. Nobody's game plan stifled the Pats offense in the postseason last year as much as Pees' did and that includes Dan Quinn with far more to work with personnel wise and he's now a HC in Atlanta. When you look at the Cheatriots scoring drives in that game the fault was in the players execution and not the game plan itself. Ridiculous trickery that preyed on the inexperience of guys like Rashaan Melvin who had no business starting in a game of that magnitude at that point in his career and was forced to due to injury. Plus the absurd ineligible receiver plays that are now illegal and were next to impossible to predict and game plan for. Pees is over criticized by our fan base, people have a hard time separating player execution from the coaching/scheme. Guys miss tackles, blow coverages, or get beat 1 on 1, and somehow the coordinator ends up being the scapegoat. That never made sense to me. Pees is far from perfect, his lack of aggression frustrates me at times, but at the end of the day I'm very happy to have him in Baltimore and appreciate what he brings to the table.