Comparing Gary Kubiak / Rick Dennison's Houston offenses to the Ravens, so that's a cumulative ranking of the two teams since 2010: Houston to the left of the slash, Baltimore on the right. Points: 14th / 16thYards: 8th / 20thPassing Yards: 13th / 17thRushing Yards: 6th / 16thCompletion%: 9th / 19thSacks (Fewest): 10th / 17thYPA (Rushing): 9th / 29thYards Per Offensive Play: 10th / 26thPlays Per Drive: 9th / 14thYards Per Drive: 12th / 18thTime of Possession Per Drive: 8th / 20thScoring Percentage Per Drive: 14th / 13thTD% Per Drive: 17th / 20thFG% Per Drive: 11th / 4thTurnover Percentage Per Drive: 5th / 7th For all intents & purposes scoring percentage per drive is a tie, it is so close: they had 266 scoring drives, we had 265, while they had 770 total drives and we had 765. So look at it this way, they have 5 more drives than we had, and they scored on one of them. Besides that though, breaking down HOW they are scoring on these offensive drives, they were getting more touchdowns than us, while we were getting more field goals. Outside of those numbers, every single other category favors Houston. And look at their playmakers as compared to ours! They had Andre Johnson at receiver, who missed 12 games over that span of time, and then who else? Kevin Walter? DeAndre Hopkins? Jacoby Jones for two of those years, who we stole and have had for two years. Owen Daniels and Garrett Graham at TE? We had Derrick Mason and Anquan Boldin, and Torrey Smith who together missed a combined 3 games during their times here in that span of seasons. Todd Heap, Dennis Pitta, Ed Dickson, and Dallas Clark at TE. They had Arian Foster as RB, who missed 11 games, and then who, Ben Tate? We had Ray Rice, who only missed 1 game in that span, and Willis McGahee, Ricky Williams, and Bernard Pierce! They had Matt Schaub at QB, who missed 12 games in that span, and T.J. Yates & Case Keenum filling in, versus Joe Flacco at QB, who has missed NO games. Tell me we shouldn't have had more offense than them. We had more depth at all playmaker positions, we had the better QB and who didn't miss any games, they had more top playmakers have to sit out due to injury, I think we had them beat in the roster department on the offensive side of the ball... so why was their offense better than ours across the board? Of course, some of that might be due to the schedule, because we routinely have one of the toughest slate of defenses to play against year in and year out, but in my opinion, our offense, with the roster we've had over these years, has woefully underperformed, and I put that at the heels of the offensive coordinators we've had. I think that what Kubiak / Dennison got out of a lackluster roster in Houston that suffered a lot of injuries and other issues and setbacks over the years, that shows he can make the most out of what he's got, so it would be interesting to see them in Baltimore.