gabefergy

definitely not in the top 10.

I've watched more tape now and updated my top 10 WRs. I still think it's a strong class. 1. Treadwell 2. Coleman 3. Doctson 4. Thomas 5. Shepard 6. Fuller 7. Boyd 8. Miller 9. Higgins 10. Cooper

Did you Tag Beachum?

I figured that was why they were still available, but compared to the overhauls the other teams need it was the best choice. I just glanced at the saints payroll for next year and it's hard to fathom how terribly they have been run.

I'll take Darth Hoodie and the Golden Boy

Saints, Pats, and Skins oof. I'll make my pick shortly

So which teams are left?

Sign me up

Haha thanks. That offense would be pretty unstoppable.

I think he is much more of a big play threat than Boyd. Boyd is definitely much more refined, but I don't see explosive playmaking with him. He looks like a solid, reliable #2 to me. High floor, lower ceiling. I think Coleman can be a guy who dominates in the NFL. Lower floor, extremely high ceiling. If we are talking about the first round, neither would be good value imo. I have Coleman rated as a top 10 player, but I wouldn't take him at #6 unless some very strange things happen. If we trade back, I think he might be perfect. Boyd I would love in the 2nd round, if we don't go WR in the first.

Jack's a good option at #6. He's one of the best athletes in the class and would be a major asset for our defense. I want playmakers on defense bottomline.

Coleman is the second best WR, hands down. Speed, explosiveness, body control, suddenness. He has it all. He plays with an attitude like he wants to dominate you. The route tree will come. Even the most college route runners have a huge step to take when they reach the NFL. Give me the physical ability and fiery competetiveness.

Aaron Donald is the closest comp I can think of, maybe some Dom Easley as well, but Robert is longer and leaner, and imo more explosive. His get-off is ridiculous.

Nkemdiche needs to work on his technique A LOT, but plays like this are just wow. https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/9135EA18B81302187880147554304_40db1882afa.5.1.5205598305309359527.mp4?versionId=mI148GBpCp6nHoc2jR8NVZbNOKkF8T6I

DLs (normally the NT or a 5T) come off the field in sub-packages, not LBs.

I would think more of a SS/nickel LB hybrid that spends a lot of time in the box or over the slot receiver. He'd have to make a huge transition to be a guy who you can trust in single high or cover 2.

I see this statement a lot. Watching the film shows he can be effective outside or lined up in the slot. He does actually use the middle of the field fairly regularly. Also lined up in the backfield on occasion and made plays as a RB.

I don't think it's as big of a difference as you are making it out to be, especially when we're in sub packages 60% of the time anyways.

Schedule 1, not class A if we are being technical. Just like marijuana...which has more positive effects than negative, yet is still grouped with drugs like heroine and ecstasy so using this type of classification to debate where it belongs is flawed because the classification of drugs by the government is flawed. In the end what matters is not the drug that was abused, but the decision to not once, but twice use and get busted. How many more times he actually took MDMA or something else is hard to know. It's up to scouts/security guys to find out if he had a problem, if he still has a problem, or if he has changed his life and readied himself to be a productive NFL player.

I don't think there is any point to discuss what drug is a worse one to take. Taking anything as an athlete is a bad decision given the risk involved. It's up to the teams to figure out if the kid is going to have a real problem following rules or if it's just a young immature kid having fun who has gotten past that stage of his life.

I can get behind that. Spence has some special talent, but also the character question mark like Nkemdiche. The FO has to put in a lot of work on those two.

Jack's better than Bucannon in every possible way, but I could see a similar role.

Any player is going to have question marks to a degree, but I've seen enough from Jack to say with confidence he will be solid to elite in all aspects of the LB position. If Ramsey is there, I would take him over Jack, that's why he is higher on the board, but I think the skillset that Jack brings is more valuable than someone like Hargreaves who I have more questions about. If the draft goes Bosa, Tunsil, Ramsey, Treadwell, Buckner who are you taking at #6? To me it's between Nkemdiche who has some big character concerns, Stanley who I have concerns about, Hargreaves who I have concerns about, and Jack who I really don't have any concerns about. Maybe you try to trade back a couple spots and still get Jack? That's a possibility, but I'm comfortable with Jack at #6. He fills a glaring need we had in coverage and his upside is immense imo.

Coleman's going to turn heads at the combine. His speed and explosiveness are elite, and he has that rare suddenness that you love to see in WRs.

Well for one, I think he will be a good run defender. He has good size for the position. He plays fast and physical, sideline to sideline. On top of that you are getting a guy who is an elite coverage player. If you watch Ramsey's tape at safety and Jack's tape I think I like what Jack does in the box more than Ramsey. I'm not sold that Ramsey would be an elite cover guy or an elite single high or even 2 high safety. His versatility and rare athletic traits are part of why he is such an impressive prospect. I see similar versatility and potential with Jack although he would be more of a hybrid LB/DB, we've seen players like Deone Bucannon be extremely effective and important in that role.