gabefergy

You could still get there.

#Murrica

Hi guys. I didnt cheat either.

My defense is only missing 1 player

Haha thanks. I like your team a lot as well. Just missed the cut. I decided to leave my team out because it us hard to be objective.

I could do a top 5, bottom 5 as a teaser. Remember it's still fluid. 1. RavensDan - Elite QB, good OL, decent weapons, solid D. 2. RayTheDay - Elite QB, good OT, good weapons, Strong D 3. SAM - Very Balanced team all around, very good OL. Average QB but very good weapons. Strong D 4. Ravens__ - Great QB, good OL, very good weapons, solid D. 5. Free Agent - Elite QB although old, solid OL, good weapons, D is average but good secondary. 26. Easternshore - Solid OL, but poor QB. Average offensive weapons. Good D though. Could improve. 27. SteelersProphet - Great QB, but awful OL. Good weapons. Old D, no pass-rush. 28. RavensAllTheWay - Good offense, but average QB. Weak defense overall. 29. CARavensfan - Good young QB, but questionable OL. Lacks weapons on O. Poor secondary despite solid front 7. 30. Horus13Corvineus - Lots of talent on D, but doesnt work together. Questionable OL construction. No QB, average weapons.

Nope.

You arent last..

Actually, I have your team ranked very high.

I said I will post it at the end. Also Truth isnt part of it because he doesnt have a roster.

So I was bored and made a Power Rankings even though we are only 18 rds in. I will keep updating it as picks come in and post it at the end. Things I looked at: QB, OL, Offensive weapons, Front 7 (weighted towards pass rush), Secondary, and overall Age/future expectations. A few notes: A lot of teams are tough to differentiate. I would say there are a few teams that stand out as superior, but most teams from around #8 - #25 are all fairly strong. Each team has some weaknesses. I probably weighted slightly towards teams that are more well balanced without glaring holes but of course it's not too late for those holes to be filled.

punters are people too

Interesting pick in Tucker. If I was taking a kicker, he wouldnt be the one I would take first. I guess you went with him because he is a Raven and he is one of the best young kickers in the league.

Thank you. I really liked him as a prospect and he played well in the limited opportunites last year. He should be a great underneath target for Flacco while Nelson and Brown can stretch the field. I love his physical style and strong hands.

Well he has stated that he is comfortable with moving on from the sport now as he has accomplished pretty much everything in his career already. Clearly money is an important factor for him, and if he doesnt get what he feels he is worth he has no problem hanging them up. I think he will end up finding a team when all is said and done, but it won't shock me of he decides to retire either.

I dont know what it is yet.

Seymour is an interesting choice. He is clearly still capable of playing at a high level, but injuries have been a problem for him as of late. He also is without a team at this point which suggests he may not have the desire to continue to play football.

Ingram is a good pick. Was thinking about taking him, but it's tough to take a guy who is about to miss an entire season when hasn't really proven himself as a NFL caliber starter yet.

Great pick in Tamme. He has been on top of my board for a while now, but I couldnt justify taking a 2nd TE over some other positions. Very good pass-catcher.

Yeah, he definitely isn't there yet. But I think the talent is there to be that kind of disruptive force and the scheme I am using is what made Sapp a HoF player.

That's not really Brockers game at all. While he is strong vs the run, his real talent will be in a penetrating role. Think Warren Sapp. Cofield is stout enough to occupy the strong side A gap, while Brockers abuses the weak side guard.

Im not sure what you mean. Cofield has played his entire career at NT, in the Giants 4-3 and then in the Redskins 3-4. I think he is a bit miscast as a 3-4 NT, but in a 4-3 he is an excellent player. Brockers is your prototypical 3T, and he has potential to become one of the best in the league. I think they are both versatile enough to play either position but Brockers should be able to dominate as an under tackle in my defense.

There's definitely a chance he gets better, but his rookie campaign was very disappointing.

There are quite a few analysts who don't think Martin stands a chance at LT.