Tiznut

If you posted video evidence before then why deny posting it again?

It seems like we got to the point where the staff feels the wrs are able to get yards after the catch so it leads to a change in philosophy.

Yeah he's getting there too. kinda feel bad cause he was said to look focused going into camp last yr.

As opposed to the natural reaction to side with the player? but back to who set the precedent. Again if 19 of 24 top 5 picks have faced this same type of issue then it's not a precedent being set by the Chargers.

If 19 of the last 24 got on or the other then it's not sd setting the precedent with bosa

Of course the Dolphins staff isn't going to run and restrain the best rookie LT in all of football. It's to far of a run from Miami to Baltimore

Not surprised with Richardson.

So Arthur brown part of first cuts?

Again you were asked for proof. You provided a link that only one player tried to fight him and claimed it to show three. After it was pointed out you made up a other excuse and here another one. Its simple. Come with proof that he's playing dirty which will include video or coaches talking about it or stop trying to address it. of course I can use your logic and say Correa is playing dirty because of the flacco and pitta getting mad at him..

So I understand what you're doing. You're bragging that Tunsil is getting first team reps at guard for Miami over a guy that was rated as one of the worse guards last yr. congrats I guess. You get a cookie now.

And again it's you using the link to back up your opinion then when pointed out that it doesn't say what you claim it did you now have another excuse. I get it you don't like the guys you haven't heard of but until you post video or coaches expressing concern you have no leg to stand on.

What is funny is it says juice to exception to what MIGHT be considered a high hit. So I'm not going to fault a guy when even the description of the hit doesn't guarantee it being questionable.

That's great but also is the advice of believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. No one here has seen, let alone shown me why I should be in the camp of "off with his head"

Man I didn't even think of the fact that brown is getting such few reps with the 1s and 2s till now. How depressing

Yeah I'm in this camp. If it was malicious as the way some have typed then it would have been addressed.

He's probably at the top because people are voting for him saying that they hoped he improved enough to start.

Not defending him per se but I'll always defend effort. Honestly if he's playing within the rules and our offense is whining because he's playing physical then they'll need to get their heads straight and remember to write him a thank you letter steelers week

And again what does that have to do with the claims made about him in practice. Not looking for any opinions on what happened. I'm looking for facts on it. This isn't hard if you think about it people said he was dirty so they can provide factual events. To point to guys getting tackled getting upset doesn't say if the hit was in fact dirty after all these are testosterone filled athletes playing a contact sport.

Think the idea is to get the best players and most rushers on the field at one time. If he's doing awesome at rushing and we can find a way to get him, Z, Suggs and doom on the field at the same time I'm all for it.

First it doesn't say 3 different players got upset. Second if they did but the hits were clean it's their problem not his. Only person that was said to got made was juice. So if you could misread that then I'm gonna go ahead and dismiss your attempt to say that the hits were bad to begin with.

I've only read the Ryan mink blurb. Can you link me to the other one?

Said by who? And let's be clear a hit as the player is running out and a hit while the player is out of bounds and whistle blown are two distinctly different events Fyi Ravens site didn't say anything about the out of bounds at all. In fact it talks about juice just being upset he was hit hard. It also reads in a manner to show that as a player onwaser as hit any and everything with the same tenacity.

They've always given players days off especially when you're looking at 90 players to coach and evaluate.

Because others are complaining about being tackled he's the one with the problem? was it a dirty tackle? Was hitting prohibited? Did he get up then go after the rbs after the play was over? You've heard of three incidents where he made a tackle and the person tackled was upset. You have not heard of him causing trouble.

Again how does any of that say he has an attitude problem? do you honestly think playing defense physically is the byproduct of an attitude problem?