Tiznut

Seems like john gets heat for something Ozzie has taken blame for: not reloading the talent. I can't see john going anywhere and tbh I'm more inclined to be on the year too late side in regards to trying to fire him like with billick. My issue with the staff is that offensively we haven't been built up like the defensive side where we were seeing coaches move on due to hc opportunities. I would like to see Baltimore be an offensive threat every game but ultimately if we win it all I don't care if we are redoing 2000. Lets others get confused on how we win just win

When healthy he's the best cb we have. So any discussion about getting rid of him needs to start with lessening the reliance on him.i.e better drafting at the cb position. Its just funny how when discussing a top players injury it's always "well just cut him" as opposed to why the position group falls off so much with that loss.

You're the type to stick your fingers in your ear and say "I can't hear you" whenever people use facts to dispute your bias....

Doesn't mean he was assigned to cover him man to man.

RIP

Looking for true general or just a bigger than life persona?

Your point is stupid and false. NFL.com talks about New England blowouts too. That said it's ridiculously stupid that you're even bringing up patriots media attention with regards to Baltimore. So again if you want to talk about the teams whose bandwagons you jump on go to their mb. http://boards.baltimoreravens.com/forum/6-ravens-talk/ notice how it's Ravenstalk.

So your response to op is to bring up the lack of attn on this mb for the pats blowout games? You do know they have their own board. May be you should go there

http://search.nfl.com/search/?query=Baltimore Ravens&sortBy=date i know it's apparently easier to claim an untruth like you did than to actually look for the coverage you claim you want

You didn't bother reading the very next post did you? So again 3 articles on the Ravens win means your posts are just full of ignorance after all you posted today that there were no articles and yet I showed 3 posted including the ones you want to dismiss as posted today.

It's game dependent. This game had more highlight plays than last week so it's going to get more mentions.

Another foolish post. I'm happy we beat Pittsburgh but that game is irrelevant to what you whined about. Youre just looking to whine and then complain when it's revealed you don't have a legitimate reason. If you truly only cared about scoreboard then you wouldn't have ever started off with your original whining post

Because one is inconsistent in the regular season. One had one good season in his career and one was coming off a major injury and is 37.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000750942/article/flacco-carves-up-dolphins-d-in-lopsided-ravens-victory one more...this was on the front page most of the day after the game too.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000751756/article/ravens-defense-riding-high-after-big-win-over-dolphins and http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000751036/article/thirtynine-things-we-learned-from-week-13 they said plenty so stop whining and trying to find bs to complain about

Nope. If we lose you'll see people blaming joe long before blaming field conditions

Dolphins should just replace the middle of their defense

He, and I, want him to win a ring first.

No. playing them next the team isn't going to watch film on them or game plan in practice for them.

I just think we have too many supposed weapons at wr to have as few passing yards as we do.

I'm just baffled at a man spending a few thousand for a weekend in New Orleans has the audacity to say something about a man spending a few thousand for a week in London.

Lol ditto. London Games start at 630am here in az. While I'm typically awaken around that time I'm not quite at the "yeah let's watch some damn football" point

It's because the defense either blitzes and prevents the qb from having time to look deep or the defenses covers everything deep and only allows the short stuff. This is also why WRs are paid to break tackles after the catch

That we are revisiting 2000?! btw if we end up with a sb win with don't care if it draws parallels to 2000

Nfl does this thing called "standings" and his this other thing called "playoffs" which makes "power rankings" irrelevant