You both make excellent points here. Another one of the reasons that the suspension was overturned was because Berman claimed that Brady didn't receive proper notice that his actions would lead to a specific punishment in one of the players handbooks he received. In other words, because players weren't informed that engaging in a conspiracy with ball boys to deflate footballs after being examined by the refs, then refusing to cooperate fully with the investigation and destroying evidence in the process warrants a 4 game suspension, Brady was punished unfairly. Essentially, the judge is requiring a system that every possible offense, along with the punishment, must be provided to all players in order for them to be disciplined while simultaneously taking it upon himself to throw out the legal maxim that "ignorance of the law is no excuse." While I'm talking about judicial failure, to kind of tie this in with what I mentioned about the phrase "generally aware" earlier, the judge also mentioned that there is no precedent from someone being suspended for being generally aware of the wrongdoings of others. I'd like to take the opportunity to introduce Judge Berman to Coach Sean Payton, who was suspended for a year because he should have been aware of the wrongdoing of the defense with the bounties (he wasn't even generally aware). This suspension was upheld by Tagliabue after he was brought in as a neutral arbiter.