Tru11

your words not mine its however noted that it does not matter to you what you say yourself. it you dont care about what you say yourself then why should anyone else care about what you say.

59 yards is a fact. you did not manipulate it down to that. stop talking none sense. you tried to manipulate other with your 60-70 yard crap but the fact remains that 59 does not fall in the 60-70 range. you did not manipulate a damm thing , you where just talking out of your butt saying that. also you where talking about scoring drives and not drives in general. unless you can proof the eagles had a scoring drive of 40 yards then stop talking none sense. i used close to 50 yards because the the eagles had a 49 yard scoring drive. in case you dont know 50 is very close to 49. fact remains that you where talking about 60-70 yards scoring drives. i am simply addressing what you said. if you forgot i can quote it for you.

40 was not option since they had 0 scoring drives of around 40 yards. they had 1 from around 49 and another was 16. that is why i said close to 50 because you know 49 is close to 50.....

you can manipulate what ever you want. the fact remains you talked about scoring drives of 60-70 yards and more and the eagles only had 1 of those drives that ended in a FG.

pretty much backfired since some of your audience apparently knew the facts better then you did. probably a good lesson for the next time.

the basis was you talking about scoring drives and not drives in general.

it is for you apparently. if it wasn't that hard you would have said it from the start since you love to lecture everyone and pride yourself on thinking you are right all the time.

its excellent field position cause if they went for a punt you would start at your own 20 which would have been considered good. NFL punters can pin a team inside their 5 yard line and with such a short field to the endzone it makes the job easier. Call me whatever you want but the facts are what they are. I have not said anything about fatigue so you might wanna quote the person you want to discuss that with. Why should i mention any of that when i was not discussing any of it? The lead could have been bigger if flacco did not throw that stupid pick. Could have been at least a 13 point lead which would have forced the eagles to go for the TD rather then settle for the FG. They had 0 of these prior to their last drive. I had actually little issue with them running the ball TBH. It keeps the clock running. Perhaps the offense can learn a thing or 2 from this since they cant even pick up a first down or burn at least half a minute when needed. fact remains of the eagles 4 long drives they only scored 15 points. 15 points is pretty darn good in today NFL. the eagles other 7 drives only netted them 11 points with 8 coming after a fumble which only had them needed to go 8 yards for a TD. the other 3 points came after the only needed 16 yards to be in FG range.

i dont care about your emotions. how you feel has nothing to do with this. facts say only 1 drive covered 60+ yards and it only went for a FG. not my fault he picked the wrong numbers in his reply. also the defense forced 1 turnover which pray to the sun ended in a TD. they also forced 2 turnovers on down giving the offense excellent field position. so they did a lot more then those 2 drives when they forced a punt. not a surprise you conveniently forgot to mention that.... 4 out of the eagles 11 drives can be considered long covering close to 50 or more yards. only 1 ended in a TD while the other 3 ended in FGs. it counted 15 of the eagles 26 points. guess where the other 11 points came from ....

funny cause the only 60-70 yard scoring drive the eagles had ended in a FG. they had 11 drives not counting the 1 before half time. might wanna check them facts before spouting anymore none sense.

nothing wrong with the call. issue was the pathetic execution by the 9th year QB. all he had to do was not turn the ball over. we where well within JT range and thus anything other then a turnover would have been fine....

was the least he could do after fumbling giving the eagles the ball at our own 8 yard line which lead to their first TD....

the way he played against the pats is your idea of him elevating his game?

Corners and pass rushers are the premium positions on defense. anytime you loose your top player at either of those positions you will suffer. it goes for every team in the NFL.

Offense plays the same crappy teams to and they still sucked.

Coordinators get fired when their scheme does not work and the gameplan they install for every game fails to produce. They oversee the entire unit. The coaching for the players individually however fall on the position coaches. The reason why Kubiak scheme worked was because he was allowed to bring in his own staff and they did instructed the players to the letter Kubiak wanted. Not every coordinator has that luxury though.

yup. even the perfect game plan will fail if players dont excecute what they where supposed to do. goes for every single facet of the game.

79 of those came on 1 play tnx to weddle. using your logic i take it you want him cut and banned from getting near the ravens since he does not know how to play defense?

what was wrong with having elam on the field?

coaches that work underneath the coordinator.... how many times do people have to say this before you get it?

he had decent pass coverage on that play. do you even know what you where watching?

i take it some on you are still unwilling to acknowledge that tom brady will be going down as 1 of the greatest if not the greatest QB to ever play the game. this is the best the QB the defense has seen all season and will be the best QB they will see all season unless they see each other again the play offs. i feel little shame in getting beat by a guy who is in the conversation of being the MVP at age 39 and is a sure fire first ballot HOF. it could have gotten much worse if the pats receivers did not drop so many passes and their special teams did not fumble the ball away. i mean even weddle fell for a fake even though he knew it was going to be a fake. its hilarious how people brag when the offense beats up on a scrappy secondary then gets outraged when the defense gets torched by 1 of the greatest QBs of all times.....

how many safeties drafted in the first round are capable of locking down receivers in 1 on 1 coverage?

what blunder did he make?

if he touched the receiver where he was standing it would have been a flag. seriously dont you even know the rules? yes he was supposed to let the receiver run past him cause the play call was designed for weddle to be there in coverage. Elam job was to defend any receiver that ran a route in front of him. he was responsible for the intermediate part of the field in the middle area past the LOS. anyone that knows defense and coverage should be able to get this TBH. Weddle had no bussines biting on the fake as there where 2 lbers waiting past the LOS. So you are actually blaming elam for a gamble that backfired on weddle?