RichieAsh

Members
  • Content count

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RichieAsh


  1. Mosley is flat out scary from an injury history, but the FO went BPA and I was glad to see them not settle for Ha Ha. The Kuechly comparisons give me hope. He's going to make plays knifing into the backfield on runs and will make plays anticipating passes. Incredibly instinctive is how I like to see defensive draft picks described.  Steelers made a mistake by falling in love with a 40 time. Mosley's a better player.

    0

  2. I'll have to watch him some more highlights, but I have read Smitty has a reputation for being really tough to jam at the line since he is a powerful little guy, and combines that with quick feet. That will be a huge addition if he can bring that to our receiving corps.

    0

  3. why is this entire board SO PRESSED on signing a old WR, or a average at best WR in FA, because that will somehow make it a smart move for us to ignore WR in the draft? 

     

    We're going to draft a guy, but Ravens fans will love the energy and intensity of how he plays. He's still effective and plays with a GIANT chip on his shoulder that's only going to be larger this year. 

    2

  4. Interesting note from the Charlotte Observer. Steve Smith would be paid $3 million by the Panthers if released, which is why he's refusing to restructure his contract for any potential trade suitors. So, unlikely to be traded, panthers will still release him for the cap savings, and he would be likely be fairly cheap considering he's already getting $3 mill from the panthers.

     

    "Because there is no offset language in Smith’s contract, he could collect the $3 million from the Panthers if he’s released, in addition to whatever money another team is willing to pay."

     

    http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/03/10/4756470/panthers-smith-divorce-close.html#.UyCKKfldWBI 

    0

  5. Did you even watch him play? He did profit off having a QB like Brady but the guy is one of the toughest receivers in the league, he makes the toughest catches, he's a guy you can count on, he catches virtually everything thrown his way. Plus he's one of the elite return men in the game, maybe even the best. To make it sound like anybody could have done what he did last season because of Brady is silly. The guy worked for his 100+ catches and his 1000+ yards. I'd love to have him here. Jacoby would never even be able to sniff close to 100 catches in NE with the same "supporting cast" (they all pretty much suck except for Brady).

    I agree with the eval of Edelman, although I wouldn't overpay for him. If you watched the Pats play last year, Edelman gave Tom Brady the luxury of being able to lock on him and trust he will get open right away. As Brady gets older he does not hold the ball to go t/ progressions because he wants nothing to do with getting hit. Edelman and Vereen were his quick pass favorite targets with no Gronk that were able to consistently get open and make tough catches. Bundchen missed Edelman several times in the AFC conference game including when he was WIDE open for what would have been a long TD in the 1st half when the game was close. 

    0

  6. IThe idea of Stevie Smith assuming he is cut, is growing on me. Smith can still run (I remember him winning his matchup with Talib pretty convincingly this year on MNF) and would give the offense that swagger that left with Anquan. We could still draft a receiver but with less pressure to be a day 1 starter, which would be a good thing for a young receiver. 

    1

  7. Lol okay.  Whatever you say.  I know he plays DT, but that's in nickel situations, which would be only a part time gig.  He's a 4-3 player, plain and simple.  Just because the 49ers want to try to make a player fit a scheme that he doesn't fit doesn't make him a 3-4 player.

     

    Maybe I'm asking for a little creativity in player use, but its not a huge stretch, and another team is considering it too. Not as crazy as moving Brandon Browner to Safety if you know what I mean.

    0

  8. Why would we invest that much money into a position that we have covered both as starters and depth?  That makes absolutely no sense.

     

    Bennett's best fit is as a 4-3 DE.  He doesn't translate well to our defense.  Stop going by the name recognition and look at how he actually fits the team.  He doesn't.

     

    Who are you Dean Pees? If the 49ers think he fits 3-4, then he obviously can, so that makes you wrong. You didn't even know he plays rush DT.

    0

  9. I hear you, but he rush

     

    He'd be a stand up pass rusher here.  We just invested into Suggs, and we invested into Dumervil last year.  Bennett doesn't fit here.

    I hear you but, that's conventional thinking, but he's more versatile than you think. He can be used in different ways and his forte is actually rushing from DT on passing downs. 

    0