redrum52

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    9,390

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by redrum52

  2. Posted · Edited by redrum52 · Report post

    1 hour ago, rmw10 said:

    TWD finale was alright.  Some filler leading up to it but at least they brought the action to wind down the season, and left with no real big cliffhangers.  All of the main characters still have some insane plot armor, and the tiger is the most ridiculous thing in this show, but it's not bad by TWD standards.

    My question. Was how does it know who to attack and if so why not send it at Negan?  Would've loved to see it tear into Carl...

    0

  3. Posted · Report post

    16 hours ago, ravensdan said:

    Power rangers?  Past my time. 

     

    I saw 2 movies today..

     

    Life... Kind of a modern version of the original Alien movie. Good. 

     

    Logan...  I thought it was pretty well done. Nice action sequences. Made good use of R rating but not over the top. It lacked a good villain though. 

    Was wondering about that... looks like an alien replica to me.

    0

  5. Posted · Report post

    2 hours ago, LosT_in_TranSlatioN said:

    He reminded me so much of Chris Pine in the first Star Trek. I really liked him and the cast. Likewise, the character development was actually really good. 

     

    Downside: The movie suffers the Godzilla syndrome and lacks a lot of Bryan Cranston and Power Rangers action. Also the costume designs are horrible and the movie has maybe the worst product placement of all time. 

     

    But I'm actually excited for a sequel. 

     

    I'd give it a 6.5/10. Needed some fine tuning but overall I really liked it. 

    The cast surprisingly had pretty good chemistry and the movie was better than I had expected.  Got a little cheesy to me when they actually got the suits, but it is what it is.

    0

  11. Posted · Report post

    Just now, usmccharles said:

    I might hate this show so much that I unfairly judge it.  I just seem to look for things to be mad about, although the show makes it damn easy. 

    The truth is, for the past season you've really only needed to watch about the last 5-10 min of the show to get the value.  That's cause the rest is pure, uncut filler...  Is filer uncut?  Anyway, you get the point.  I'm with you.  You're frustrated to the point that most of the things they do are stupid and it's also they've been rinsing and repeating this goddam formula for so long at this point.  I don't expect anything great from the next two episodes.  Maybe one wow moment, while left after the season finale wondering why I'm still going to come back for more...

    0

  12. Posted · Report post

    On 3/22/2017 at 0:20 PM, usmccharles said:

    I was asking what villains in TWD you liked better, im not familiar with Supernatural.  Since you don't watch a lot of tv, I really wouldn't waste more time on this show but im sure you are like me and just too 'pot committed.'

    Perfect explanation. 

     

     

    I die a little inside with each episode I watch.  About to start re-watching Always Sunny...

    0

  13. Posted · Report post

    On 3/20/2017 at 7:59 AM, rmw10 said:

    It also makes me pretty confused/angry that a show like TWD can stick around for 2359 seasons but a show like The Leftovers, which is far superior in every single aspect, can only muster up 3 seasons due to low viewership.

    It's because shows like TWD keep people hate watching it, in fear that if they start another show, it might start good(like TWD)  and turn to manure(like TWD).  I really dislike this show.  BCS coming back in next month.  Sell me on The Leftovers, too.

    0

  14. Posted · Edited by redrum52 · Report post

    2 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

    The slightest criticism is met a flurry of excuses. This thread doesn't really have an in-between. It's either people who really hate Joe or people who absolutely love Flacco and would go to the end of the Earth to defend him. Very few in betweens.

    How's that red pill?

     

    Also, didn't want it restructured.  Thought it was best to release him and move on, but the team obviously has other plans.  We'll see.

    0

  15. Posted · Report post

    5 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

    That's why I want to see Pitta cut. Joe just relies too heavily on him. I hated the contract to begin with, but now it's really becoming a detriment to the team. 

    If Joe were forced to spread the ball around more heavily and not just check it down to Pitta at the first sign of danger, I think we could see a more 2014-esque season. 

    I wanted Pitta gone as well.  Deepest position and would like to see the other guys get their chance.  Feel keeping him will stunt the other players development and as you said provide a false sense of security.  Could've used the extra cap space as well.

    0

  16. Posted · Report post

    42 minutes ago, BmoreBird22 said:

    Take Wilson off in a heartbeat.

    I'd put Bradford on if he stayed healthy. And Winston is looking really good these days. Plus there's Stafford.

    Stafford only looks good cause of Calvin though?   Right...

    0

  17. Posted · Edited by redrum52 · Report post

    31 minutes ago, The Raven said:

    We still debate over Flacco?

    Boards closing soon.  Lets send this one out with a bang...

     
    21 minutes ago, Tru11 said:

    quite curious if you also know what the QBs job is.

    interesting how you always manage to list everyone else job and what they are supposed to do except the highest paid position in the NFL.....

     

    :lol:

    20 minutes ago, LosT_in_TranSlatioN said:

    I'll bite

    rodgers

    brady

    ben

    brees

    carr

    luck

    wilson

    ryan

    Good list.  Reason I asked though was to get an understanding of what and who he should be compared with.  Without that theres no point in the discussion.

    0

  18. Posted · Report post

    1 hour ago, frozen joe flacco fan said:

    The glaring and obvious disparity between his YPA in 2016 vs. other years is simply a function of two things. One is executing the play called. The second is dumping the ball off to a sure-handed back, like Juice was and Danny Woodhead will be, when nobody else can gain separation. That being said, there were a number of times when Joe pulled the trigger prematurely 'cause he was afraid of having someone crash into his left leg. When will some of his most ardent critics get it? A receiver's job is "see the ball; catch the ball." That's not what Aiken, Moore, Waller, Perriman and Wallace have demonstrated they can do consistently. Again, Justin Tucker appears to have better hands. Until and unless Ozzie fills the holes in the offensive line and brings in some stud wide receivers, nothing as in nada will change. You criticize Joe for having tunnel vision and throwing too many times to Dennis. Besides Dennis, who is Joe's Go To man/ The answer is clear. It was Steve Sr.. Now its .............????????????????? Fill in the blank and we can put this to bed.

    Where would you rank Joe among qbs?  Who do you think is better than him?

    0

  21. Posted · Report post

    53 minutes ago, J.O.14 said:

    They did low ball him for the way he has played. They offered him a 3 year 12 million dollar deal. Then I think they offered him 4 years 24 was the most they would go. The 3 year 12 million feels kind of like a low ball when you're the type of player he is.

     

    1 hour ago, poescrows said:

    I would take that to mean the Ravens offered less than Cleveland, but more than Cards.

    I'm not knocking him, but don't say it's not about the money when less that a minute ago you talked about money not being a reason you stayed somewhere.  

    0

  24. Posted · Edited by redrum52 · Report post

    25 minutes ago, Ravens4Real said:

    The Ravens are one strong gust of wind away from having Mike Wallace and Chris Moore as their starting WR's. If that doesn't scare some of you, I'm not sure what will. 

    Edit: The opening sentence is a jab at how injury prone Camp and Perrimen are since I know I would have to clarify myself because some of you don't mesh well with Ravens criticism. 

    Mike Wallace would be starting on the current roster and most likely come opening day.

     

    I get your point, though.

    2

  25. Posted · Report post

    1 minute ago, ravensnation5220 said:

    It's funny I looked at his highlights and read the comments and in 2015 all the cowboys fans said he sucks, then in 2016 they all said he's underrated and a solid player.

    Funny how winning can change fans minds

    He should be "solid" and reliable, at the very least.  I personally think he'll be an upgrade over Wright and like him over Claiborne for the simple fact he's been on the field.  

    2