gooftroop

Who said it was "very bad"? Not me. And I didn't mention anything about a single half of football, either...

Anybody here remember how our defense played in 2012? Or are you confusing that defense with the 2000 squad?

I'd substitute "sound" with "uninspired".

Don't see why we passed on OJ Howard...

Good deal.

Two flags in three quarters. What discipline by these teams- not a hold, or a PI, by either team. Astounding!

Joe ain't Ben or Brady, but look at the time to throw, with receivers running open all over the field. Flacco can only dream about that...

Joe ain't Ben or Brady, but look at the time to throw, with receivers running open all over the field. Flacco can only dream about that...

Best wishes to Zach. Judging by the opinions of those who know him, things will work out, for him- no matter what lies ahead...

LOL, nice try bud. I'm afraid the facts just don't support your little theory... 1. Flacco certainly outplayed Tyrod in week 1. Can pretty much pick literally any stat you want there and it will be in favor of Flacco. 2. Was as good or better than Josh McCown in first meeting with the Browns 3. Was as good or comparable to Blake Bortles. 4. Was as good or comparable to Kirk Cousins. 5. Unequivocally outplayed Big Ben in the first meeting in Baltimore. 6. Easily outplayed McCown/Kessler in the 2nd meeting against the Browns. 7. Was as good or comparable to Andy Dalton in the first meeting with the Bengals. 8. Easily outplayed Ryan Tannehill 9. Played better than Carson Wentz 10. Could argue he was comparable to Big Ben in their 2nd matchup in Pittsburgh. LOL at you is right. Picking individual weeks where Joe might've outplayed a qb. PATHETIC. just like Joe was this year Cousins was way better this year Oh, he outplayed Ben after he was seriously hurt? wow Outplayed McCown adn Kessler!!!?!?!?!?!?! Yeah Joe!!!!!!!!!LOL are you kidding me????????? Yes, he MIGHT HAVE played better than a couple qbs in the league this year. Meaning he wasn't the very worst qb in the league. Just 3rd or 4th from the bottom. LOL Sorry BUD, we would've been better off with Mallet this year. Very few Ravens fans that watched every game this year would disagree Disagree with what? Something that didn't happen?

Perhaps he meant 18 pts against the Pats won't get it done.

Not often that you hear players, owners, coaches, management, and business partners all holding one person in the same high regard. RIP...

Might not have happened if 48 had been called for head hunting the first time- like he should have. Or, he'd be gone. Either way, they couldn't wait to throw that flag on Ajay. Nothing new, seen it many times before. I still think the Rooney's have the negatives!

Hard to cover when they're getting blocked 10 yards down the field- before the ball is even in the air.

No flag on leading with the helmet? #48 left his feet, even.

I hope you're not expecting the rules to be enforced. Steelers always go to the pick play on third down...

Screen game my behind. Blocks laid way before the ball's in the air. No laundry, of course...

Who were the HOF'ers on our 2012 offense, again?

They tried to make Joe a nine passes in a 13-play drive kind of qb, and it didn't work. He simply isn't consistent enough in his reads, and his throws. We need to get the ball down the field, and I don't mean a deep fly, and a prayer. Whatever happened to those deep outs and seam patterns we had so much success with in the past? Let's play to Joe's strengths, not his weaknesses.

Well, the conversation was about that Flacco, in order to break a record (and win the game be damned), was feeding his buddy- and nothing else. So whether or not the team showed up, or SSS retired, is irrelevant. Anyway, if you tell me that disagreeing with you makes me naive, so be it. I didn't know I was in the presence of a mind-reader...

Not so fast- you claimed to know what Joe was up to, and I said that was ridiculous. Now, you say it was only an opinion- then go om to cite others opinions as proof.

Complete baloney. Say what you will about Joe's performance, but to accuse him of trying to pad his buddy's stats to break a record (a record I'd wager he knew nothing of), even if it meant losing the game, is nonsense.

This seems to run contrary to public opinion, but, aside from no major injuries, what I want most is win. We're playing the Bengals. I mean, do you think there will be any revelations, at this point in the season? I don't. Just get a W...

Hard to believe this is the same 89 who, at one time, was regarded as a bad egg, if not an outright punk. Seems like he figured out a way to keep all of his good qualities, while shedding some of the bad ones. Great story, really...

Why not deliver the compliment without the negativity?