metalraven

True. But we can longer use that as an argument against them. It's not their fault the division sucks. Ya, it'd be nice to have a cupcake division; but Pats have proved over and over that it does not matter who they play - they're usually better. That is a fact. The AFCG and super bowls have nothing to do with the division. They win, and they can beat anybody, any time.

Results are what matter the most, in the end. Not athletic ability. By your logic, Michael Vick is one of the GOATs. It is now undeniable. Whatever the reasons may be; Brady has been a winner for 16+ years, and NEVER shows signs of slowing down. I'd take Brady over Rogers any day of the week. (Ouch - that hurts to say) lol

I'm done "hating" on the Pats. That comeback was insane. Brady is the GOAT, hands down. To do what he's done at that age and always with a bunch of no-names, is just ridiculous. We can call them cheaters, or say they're in a weak division; and even state that the Falcons play calling late was atrocious; but the results show that we're witnessing the greatest football of our time. It really, REALLY pains me to admit it, as I hate the Pats; but I have to tip my hat, and concede: Brady is the greatest of all time.

I like Torrey Smith as a person, but for the same reason you mentioned about the picks is why I don't want him back. I would prefer a guy that is going to go up and make the contested catch and not just lean up against the guy that is defending him enough to draw a P.I. Again, Torrey is a good dude, but he isn't one of those "play makers" the Ravens should be looking for. I agree. He's a one trick pony, and even with that one trick, he was very inconsistent.

So basically, just draft a bunch of offensive players, pray that they play well, and don't worry about the defense at all? I mean there's no question that heading into 2015 the defense was a bigger problem than the offense (frankly had been for a couple years, dating back to the SB), so in the 2014 draft you would have snagged two WRs and a RB, while not addressing the defense at all? Outstanding. Seems like a good recipe to lose every game 38-35. Ask the Atlanta Falcons. They proved how that model doesn't work. They've had a high powered offense for years. When they started focusing on getting younger and more athletic on defense and beefing up the offensive line, they became a good football team. This isn't rocket science folks. The good teams are largely balanced. These high powered offenses that neglect the defense struggle to win football games on an annual basis. Exactly

I would say the latter

Finally someone who know's football this guy wears down and takes plays off I like him at the right price but he is not worth top dollar we need to spend on pass rush and CB I am just glad that we have a guy on here with 5 years of organized football experience like yourself. Your commentary is always so insightful. He is right about B Williams though.

Brandon Williams asks: "Where is the love?" I ask: Where were you during that last quarter of the season?

Same here. I have no issues with the Falcons, nor Matt Ryan. And like you, I hate the Pats with a passion.

1. I don't think DeSean is even a part of this discussion. He doesn't really bring any skill sets that Wallace or Perriman don't have at this point, and he certainly doesn't fit the mold of the kind of receiver we are looking for anyway. 2. I'd expect one of them to be retained by Washington. My money would be on Garcon, but he is the kind of player we would be looking for, though he also could be a bit outside of our price range. Exactly. DeSean is good, but adding him would be redundant, and certainly would not benefit offense as a whole.

Just FYI, Tom made $28.7M playing football for the Patriots this year. Cap hit and what he actually gets paid are two different things. Ya. I remember when everyone was heaping praise on him because he was so "unselfish" regarding his contract. But the numbers, when broken down, actually showed Brady benefiting financially. I don't remember the details, but I'm always skeptical when any article speaks of how "unselfish" Brady is.

Regarding point 1 - I'm not sure it would make a different. Those guys know their role. They play within the system. When a player goes to NE, he knows he's not going to be "the guy", or a super star. The players that last on that team understand one thing: Win, even if it means I won't be a superstar. It's attitude, culture.

I wondering when does the statement " You can't teach an old dog new tricks start to come into play? Joe's played practically the same the last 4 years. Yep. Prior to the injury, he was the same. I hope he somehow does learn "new tricks" in 2017. I would love to see it. But I doubt it.

I share the sentiment of others here: I feel our roster could use upgrades, of course. However, I think this year was more of a coaching problem. If they can rectify that, and utilize the existing talent we have, I think we'll be back in the hunt.

hahaha. my god, man. no. freaking. way. not even in the same conversation.

Guy needs to learn how to tackle LOL. And the "Most Ignorant Comment of the Year" goes to...YOU

Here's an idea: How about everyone KNOW their role, and play their role well. You don't need a Julio Jones to win a SB. In fact, the most recent SB winners never had a Julio Jones-like receiver. Correct me if I'm wrong, but when teams do have those types of receivers, they end up not being very good because all of their money is dumped on that one guy. I hate to use them as an example, but the last time the Pats had a #1 WR was when Moss played for them. Yes, they were awesome, but they didn't win a SB. The Pats have been most successful with role players - and everyone knowing their place. A Julio Jones would be awesome to have. So don't misunderstand me. But having a truly dominant WR is rarely the recipe for continued, consistent success. However, fundamentals are. Do all the little things right, and big things happen.

Percentage was great but don't forget all the dump off passes. That always helps accuracy but doesn't help much else. Exactly. If I shoot layups all of the time, my shooting percentage will look great. It'd be interesting to see a chart of the percentage differences every 5-10 yards; I bet beyond 10 yards his accuracy drops considerably.

Maybe I should have prefaced that statement with "In my opinion." Nothing I said was absolute. Just what I think, is all.

I agree. Brady perfectly fits the system he's in. I really don't think he'd be as good under a different system

Exactly. "Hey. Congratulations for coming back from your coke binge. Here's comeback player of the year!"

No doubt. If I were a coach, I'd fill a roster spot with one guy from the practice squad, send him on the very first Pats possession, and just PUNISH Brady. Legal or not, just wreck him. Pay for his fine, give him a bonus, and send him home. lol

I'm with you all the way, mom. Us much as I dislike the Steelers; I absolutely hate the Patriots. Tom Brady is the biggest whining, baby I've ever seen on a football field. Dude throws tantrums for getting tackled. I respect Ben as a football player, and I respect the Steelers organization, generally. But I have zero respect for the Patriots. I'd much rather the Steelers win the SB than the Pats. And besides, they're representing the AFC North. Ya, it sucks it ain't us, but as long as it ain't the Pats, I can live with it. lol

And how would you manage this cap-space wise? lol. some fans think that the NFL is like Madden where you can turn the salary cap on or off.

Only place Williams is a beast is at the dinner table ,he is so overrated he makes some plays but he takes plays off and at times gets man handled by 1 on 1's with guys that are smaller than him Apparently you know better than just about the complete NFL analyst and expert scene... Because the prevailing view on Brandon Williams is quite the opposite of yours... you obviously didn't watch the steelers game where he got manhandled lol ya dude. the last 4 games he was useless