My memory isn't selective as all. I remember 2010 being the best year of his career up to that point and the team deciding to get rid of two of his best weapons to rely on 2 rookies(Smith, Doss) 2 2nd year players(Pitta, Dickson) and a new WR(Evans) that was in great decline the next year. So what happened, instead of his production staying the course of the steady incline or even exploding, it dipped because Flacco went from a wealth of experience to being asked to rely on inexperienced kids. Flacco went from a combined 132rec 1,895yds 15Tds from Mason, Heap and Housh to a grand total of 12rec 153yds 1TD to replace that production. Your young franchise QB is taking the next step in his development and you decide to do a overhaul on offense and with inexperienced players no less. I love the Ravens brass but no other top organization would do this foolishness. This was just one example of factors that has lead to Flacco being so pedestrian in the regular, but I think it was the most defining moment in his career and that's basically how every 2-3 years of his career.
I agree with you 100% that Flacco has been pedestrian and inconsistent much of the regular season throughout his career, but the Ravens brass has to take a ton of that responsibility because I haven't seen any team mishandle the QB position as bad as the Ravens have. Not comparing Flacco to Brady here, but I think that example is a good one. When the Pats realized that the NFL was no longer a "Defense wins Championships" league and they couldn't rely on their defense like they did for Brady's 1st 7 years, they changed with the times. From 00'-06' Brady's numbers were just as pedestrian as Flacco's. But the Pats knew in order to get ahead of the times or at least keep up, they had to hand the offense over to Brady. So what did they do, They knew added players to hide Brady's deficiencies. Moss for the deep ball, Welker who gets open quick because Brady.wasn't a tigh window passer and Stallworth to take advantage of the other two pulling coverage. Much like Flacco, this was the defining moment of Brady's career because it gave him the confidence that he no only could win a SB but also carry his offense.
So when you say the Ravens need to supply Flacco with great talent that can help carry this team, I don't see it as a knock to Flacco like so many others do. I actually agree and think it should have been done a long time ago, because that's exactly how the game's greatest QBs were ushered into greatness, the talent surrounding them. Who was Montana without Rice, Aikman without Irvin, Peyton without Harrison, Wayne and James, Rodger without Driver and Gennings and I could go on. Flacco has to be better in the regular season no doubt, but the FO has to take a long hard look at how they want this team to go. You can't scream Flacco is your guy, pay him but don't surround him with adequate talent. I respect the Ravens for wanting to build a balanced team and keep that long standing tradition of Baltimore being known for great defense. However you have to make a decision on either building a great offense or great defense because if you don't the overall team will be mediocre imo and making your QB the highest paid in the NFL should make that decision clear.