ravensdfan

Members
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    13,741

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

About ravensdfan

  • Rank
    Hall of Famer

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Steeler Country PA

Single Status Update

See all updates by ravensdfan

  1. ravensdfan

    Today the Patriots single handedly destroyed the honor of the Lombardi & tarnished its image. On top of that, they have destroyed any meaning that SB MVP held by awarding it to Tom Brady after a 2 INT game. Shameful.

    1. Show previous comments  25 more
    2. ravensdfan

      ravensdfan

      Not QBR, QB rating. And it is more like bottom 25. Bear in mind that group is mixed and he is at the top of it.

    3. JoeyFlex5

      JoeyFlex5

      if qbr doesnt stand for qb rating then what does it stand for? i always assumed thats what it was.

      i still find it hard to believe that you can actually rank his performance in the bottom half of all time super bowl performances by a qb, and if the numbers show that, then thats why ill say its a flawed stat. i still think edelman deserved it more

    4. ravensdfan

      ravensdfan

      There are a lot of great QB performances in SBs. QBR is the made-up ESPN stat. QB rating is what has been used for eons.

      Brady's rating was 101. Flacco's was 124. There are about 5 in the 140 range, two in the 150 range and then about 4 to 5 in the 110 to 119 range. There is a logjam at Brady's rating of 101. Quite a few.

    5. Show next comments  9 more